A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How to promote this thing we do (long post)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st 07, 04:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jeff[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default How to promote this thing we do (long post)


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
ups.com...

I believe LSA is the way to go, but that does not necessarily mean
operating under the sport pilot rules. This could be the single most
important factor for rescuing GA from dying. Anyone can fly the LSA,
even under IFR, and is a much more economical option than the normal
category airplanes. Our club recently got rid of the 172 and bought a
brand new LSA, with a fully loaded panel, and the response has been
very positive. The airplane is being flown significantly more than the
other airplanes. The hourly cost is $50/hr tach which is almost half
that of the 172. For two people flying, you can't beat the price to
performance ratio. With more LSA coming into the scene, I see a bright
future ahead.



I agree that LSA is the best hope we have, but I worry about how much hope
there is with it. When the idea of the LSA came out a few years back, I was
pumped. I thought *THIS* will save GA, but browsing OSH this year and
noticing that the average LSA pricetag is $100k+ for an entry model, again
puts ownership out of the reach of most people. Now in 10 years, those same
LSA's will be used airplanes that someone might be able to buy for $35k (in
today's money), but that's 10 years down the road.

What is sad (and I'm preaching to the choir here), is that I know a guy who
was an air traffic controller in 1974 and bought a brand new 182 loaded for
$28k. At the time, he was a GS13 making $23k. Traslate that into today's
prices and salaries, an ATC at that level now makes $100kish, so the same
182 *should* run in the $130-$150k range. 150's should be sold for the
$40-$50k. I guess looking back doesn't help, but it now makes sense as to
why there are less pilots than there used to be. We're squeezing out the
average guy.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trying to promote old man Instrument Flight Rules 0 January 27th 04 07:56 PM
150HP Super Yankee FS I forgot to post one last thing! Bill Berle Home Built 0 October 20th 03 09:46 AM
150HP Super Yankee FS I forgot to post one last thing! Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 0 October 20th 03 09:46 AM
150HP Super Yankee FS I forgot to post one last thing! Bill Berle Owning 0 October 20th 03 09:46 AM
First Emergency (Long Post) [email protected] Owning 14 July 23rd 03 02:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.