![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Dohm" wrote The *really* hard part, at least for me, will be to remember to look this up after the final report is released. OTOH, there may be a new thread started to serve as a reminder. I'm countin' on youse guys. Jeez-o-Pete! Where ya'll from, talkin' like'at? g But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would NOT be started when the report is out? I can't! small smiley here, laughing at ourselves -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would NOT be started when the report is out? Then can I opin on what I saw with my own eyes? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff wrote: But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would NOT be started when the report is out? Then can I opin on what I saw with my own eyes? Eyewitness accounts of plane crashes are interesting when investigated. At Cape May in 1971 at the Air Races we lost 5 planes in two separate mid-air collisions in the same race. I was an eye witness to that event along with many others. During the investigation, we interviewed several eye witnesses. Many of these people had seen the event from the same direction and the same angle. No two eye witnesses reported seeing exactly the same thing. The macro picture was close, but the micro details were quite different, and it's the details in such an event that are needed by an investigating team. I discussed this at some length with a friend of mine from the FBI on a later occasion. He verified what I had suspected; that there is a highly complicated mental process involved with visual impact shock vs recall that involves the mind "adjusting" what the eye has seen in an instant in time to reflect a preconceived path of logic that involves the mind mentally completing in recall by "adjusted" logic detail that the mind says should be there to complete the picture. The rest of it was WAY over my pay grade, but the bottom line is that when you see something as traumatic as say a mid-air collision, your eyewitness account of that event can be flawed. Dudley Henriques |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
... Jeff wrote: But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would NOT be started when the report is out? Then can I opin on what I saw with my own eyes? Eyewitness accounts of plane crashes are interesting when investigated. At Cape May in 1971 at the Air Races we lost 5 planes in two separate mid-air collisions in the same race. I was an eye witness to that event along with many others. During the investigation, we interviewed several eye witnesses. Many of these people had seen the event from the same direction and the same angle. No two eye witnesses reported seeing exactly the same thing. The macro picture was close, but the micro details were quite different, and it's the details in such an event that are needed by an investigating team. I discussed this at some length with a friend of mine from the FBI on a later occasion. He verified what I had suspected; that there is a highly complicated mental process involved with visual impact shock vs recall that involves the mind "adjusting" what the eye has seen in an instant in time to reflect a preconceived path of logic that involves the mind mentally completing in recall by "adjusted" logic detail that the mind says should be there to complete the picture. The rest of it was WAY over my pay grade, but the bottom line is that when you see something as traumatic as say a mid-air collision, your eyewitness account of that event can be flawed. Dudley Henriques Very nicely stated. Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB final report on Hendrick crash | Jim Macklin | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | November 15th 06 09:54 PM |
NTSB report - ILS and ATC. How does it all come together? | Montblack | Piloting | 21 | June 22nd 06 10:35 PM |
Prelim NTSB report on the Piper Navajo crash landing | gregg | Piloting | 5 | July 16th 05 04:40 PM |
Preliminary NTSB report on Walton accident | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 11 | July 12th 05 04:23 PM |
NTSB Preliminary report on HPN crash | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | May 10th 05 08:37 PM |