A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Preliminary NTSB Report on the Oshkosh P51 Crash Released



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 4th 07, 04:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Preliminary NTSB Report on the Oshkosh P51 Crash Released


"Peter Dohm" wrote

The *really* hard part, at least for me, will be to remember to look this
up
after the final report is released. OTOH, there may be a new thread
started
to serve as a reminder.

I'm countin' on youse guys.


Jeez-o-Pete! Where ya'll from, talkin' like'at? g

But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would NOT
be started when the report is out?

I can't! small smiley here, laughing at ourselves
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old August 4th 07, 01:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
Jeff[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Preliminary NTSB Report on the Oshkosh P51 Crash Released


But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would
NOT
be started when the report is out?


Then can I opin on what I saw with my own eyes?


  #3  
Old August 4th 07, 03:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Preliminary NTSB Report on the Oshkosh P51 Crash Released



Jeff wrote:
But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread would
NOT
be started when the report is out?


Then can I opin on what I saw with my own eyes?


Eyewitness accounts of plane crashes are interesting when investigated.
At Cape May in 1971 at the Air Races we lost 5 planes in two separate
mid-air collisions in the same race. I was an eye witness to that event
along with many others. During the investigation, we interviewed several
eye witnesses. Many of these people had seen the event from the same
direction and the same angle. No two eye witnesses reported seeing
exactly the same thing. The macro picture was close, but the micro
details were quite different, and it's the details in such an event that
are needed by an investigating team.
I discussed this at some length with a friend of mine from the FBI on a
later occasion.
He verified what I had suspected; that there is a highly complicated
mental process involved with visual impact shock vs recall that involves
the mind "adjusting" what the eye has seen in an instant in time to
reflect a preconceived path of logic that involves the mind mentally
completing in recall by "adjusted" logic detail that the mind says
should be there to complete the picture.
The rest of it was WAY over my pay grade, but the bottom line is that
when you see something as traumatic as say a mid-air collision, your
eyewitness account of that event can be flawed.
Dudley Henriques
  #4  
Old August 4th 07, 11:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Preliminary NTSB Report on the Oshkosh P51 Crash Released

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...


Jeff wrote:
But seriously - from this group, can you imagine that a new thread

would
NOT
be started when the report is out?


Then can I opin on what I saw with my own eyes?


Eyewitness accounts of plane crashes are interesting when investigated.
At Cape May in 1971 at the Air Races we lost 5 planes in two separate
mid-air collisions in the same race. I was an eye witness to that event
along with many others. During the investigation, we interviewed several
eye witnesses. Many of these people had seen the event from the same
direction and the same angle. No two eye witnesses reported seeing
exactly the same thing. The macro picture was close, but the micro
details were quite different, and it's the details in such an event that
are needed by an investigating team.
I discussed this at some length with a friend of mine from the FBI on a
later occasion.
He verified what I had suspected; that there is a highly complicated
mental process involved with visual impact shock vs recall that involves
the mind "adjusting" what the eye has seen in an instant in time to
reflect a preconceived path of logic that involves the mind mentally
completing in recall by "adjusted" logic detail that the mind says
should be there to complete the picture.
The rest of it was WAY over my pay grade, but the bottom line is that
when you see something as traumatic as say a mid-air collision, your
eyewitness account of that event can be flawed.
Dudley Henriques


Very nicely stated.
Peter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NTSB final report on Hendrick crash Jim Macklin Instrument Flight Rules 51 November 15th 06 09:54 PM
NTSB report - ILS and ATC. How does it all come together? Montblack Piloting 21 June 22nd 06 10:35 PM
Prelim NTSB report on the Piper Navajo crash landing gregg Piloting 5 July 16th 05 04:40 PM
Preliminary NTSB report on Walton accident ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 11 July 12th 05 04:23 PM
NTSB Preliminary report on HPN crash Peter R. Instrument Flight Rules 83 May 10th 05 08:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.