![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 7:34 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
The drag is induced by the cooling itself. How can the drag be induced by the cooling itself? If I understand you, the same cowling with the same air flow shows significantly different drag depending on whether the engine inside is hot or cold. I honestly don't understand that. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 7, 7:34 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: The drag is induced by the cooling itself. How can the drag be induced by the cooling itself? If I understand you, the same cowling with the same air flow shows significantly different drag depending on whether the engine inside is hot or cold. I honestly don't understand that. The air entering the engine compartment, and flowing past the running engine's hot cooling fins expands at LEAST double. That is why the exit opening is much larger than the intake. That is why there have been claims that the P-51 has a positive cooling drag, that is the heated air exiting actually gives more thrust than the drag of air entering the radiator passage and going past the radiator. -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 7, 7:34 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: The drag is induced by the cooling itself. How can the drag be induced by the cooling itself? If I understand you, the same cowling with the same air flow shows significantly different drag depending on whether the engine inside is hot or cold. I honestly don't understand that. The air entering the engine compartment, and flowing past the running engine's hot cooling fins expands at LEAST double. That is why the exit opening is much larger than the intake. That is why there have been claims that the P-51 has a positive cooling drag, that is the heated air exiting actually gives more thrust than the drag of air entering the radiator passage and going past the radiator. -- Jim in NC Double? Naah. It expands, but doesn't double. Boyle's law (PV=NRT) is based on absolute temperature, which is measured in kelvin. Kelvin is Celsius plus 273 degrees. Guessing now, if the air temp went from 300k to 350k (or about 80F/27C to about 160F/70C) you'd see volume increase by (350/300 -1) = 1/6th = about 17%... KB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in
: "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 7, 7:34 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: The drag is induced by the cooling itself. How can the drag be induced by the cooling itself? If I understand you, the same cowling with the same air flow shows significantly different drag depending on whether the engine inside is hot or cold. I honestly don't understand that. The air entering the engine compartment, and flowing past the running engine's hot cooling fins expands at LEAST double. That is why the exit opening is much larger than the intake. That is why there have been claims that the P-51 has a positive cooling drag, that is the heated air exiting actually gives more thrust than the drag of air entering the radiator passage and going past the radiator. -- Jim in NC Double? Naah. It expands, but doesn't double. Boyle's law (PV=NRT) is based on absolute temperature, which is measured in kelvin. Kelvin is Celsius plus 273 degrees. Guessing now, if the air temp went from 300k to 350k (or about 80F/27C to about 160F/70C) you'd see volume increase by (350/300 -1) = 1/6th = about 17%... KB It's certainly standard practice, at least on airplanes where min cooling drag is desired, that the outlet be conderably larger than the inlet... Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote Double? Naah. It expands, but doesn't double. Boyle's law (PV=NRT) is based on absolute temperature, which is measured in kelvin. Kelvin is Celsius plus 273 degrees. Guessing now, if the air temp went from 300k to 350k (or about 80F/27C to about 160F/70C) you'd see volume increase by (350/300 -1) = 1/6th = about 17%... OK. I have always heard the approximate rule for good cooling is double the intake size for the exit size. Guess it doesn't transfer to expansion. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Kyle Boatright" wrote Double? Naah. It expands, but doesn't double. Boyle's law (PV=NRT) is based on absolute temperature, which is measured in kelvin. Kelvin is Celsius plus 273 degrees. Guessing now, if the air temp went from 300k to 350k (or about 80F/27C to about 160F/70C) you'd see volume increase by (350/300 -1) = 1/6th = about 17%... OK. I have always heard the approximate rule for good cooling is double the intake size for the exit size. Guess it doesn't transfer to expansion. -- Maybe the velocity of the exit gasses are less. This would cause them to need more area. Danny Deger |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Morgans wrote
OK. I have always heard the approximate rule for good cooling is double the intake size for the exit size. Guess it doesn't transfer to expansion. Did you mean to write, "... double the exit size for the intake size?" If not, you lost me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message ... Jim Morgans wrote OK. I have always heard the approximate rule for good cooling is double the intake size for the exit size. Guess it doesn't transfer to expansion. Did you mean to write, "... double the exit size for the intake size?" If not, you lost me. Difficult to communicate that clearly, I guess. Try this. If the cooling intake is 50 square inches, the exit for the cooling air is 100 square inches. For planes with moveable cowl openings, that would be with the cowl open full. -- Jim in NC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doh! I get what you wrote now. Ain't English great. So easy to be almost
mostly not misunderstood. g "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message ... Jim Morgans wrote OK. I have always heard the approximate rule for good cooling is double the intake size for the exit size. Guess it doesn't transfer to expansion. Did you mean to write, "... double the exit size for the intake size?" If not, you lost me. Difficult to communicate that clearly, I guess. Try this. If the cooling intake is 50 square inches, the exit for the cooling air is 100 square inches. For planes with moveable cowl openings, that would be with the cowl open full. -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Kyle Boatright" wrote Double? Naah. It expands, but doesn't double. Boyle's law (PV=NRT) is based on absolute temperature, which is measured in kelvin. Kelvin is Celsius plus 273 degrees. Guessing now, if the air temp went from 300k to 350k (or about 80F/27C to about 160F/70C) you'd see volume increase by (350/300 -1) = 1/6th = about 17%... OK. I have always heard the approximate rule for good cooling is double the intake size for the exit size. Guess it doesn't transfer to expansion. Thanks for the info on the air expanding. Does this translate into more drag if the engine is running? Danny Deger |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
monitoring pusher props | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 11 | May 16th 06 11:53 PM |
Pusher props for WW I fighters | John Bailey | Military Aviation | 3 | September 11th 04 10:18 AM |
Interested in Tractor vs. Pusher Gyroplane | Dunewood Truglia, Esq. | Rotorcraft | 1 | July 2nd 04 04:26 PM |
1/2 VW and a shrouded/ducted propeller? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 9 | May 6th 04 05:33 AM |
Ducted Fan Design | David | Home Built | 5 | February 7th 04 06:15 AM |