![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dallas wrote:
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:31:41 -0000, Jim Logajan wrote: So when Jeppesen said "assuming all other variables remain constant" it was basically saying "assuming the density remains constant." Are you pretty comfortable with that statement? Pretty comfortable. Although I admit I did better in quantum mechanics in college than thermo and statistical phsyics. :-) I can't imagine why Jeppesen would bother to publish the paragraph if the assumption was that the density would remain constant, which is basically impossible outside the laboratory, (at least, as far as I know) and makes whole statement of no value to a pilot in the real world. Well, it looks like they were trying to make a point and be technically accurate. I believe that typically requires making text-book simplifying assumptions. "Assuming all other variables remain constant". - I picture two barometers a few miles apart on a consistent, flat surface. There is no wind and the sky is overcast. A hole in the overcast opens up and heats the area around the first barometer. If I correctly interpret what Jeppesen appears to be saying, the pressure in the area of the heated barometer will rise above the barometer in the shade. Your interpretation matches exactly what they say: "On the other hand, a warmer temperature increases atmospheric pressure, all else being equal." But the problem is that "all else" _doesn't_ remain equal in your scenario. That is why I think the Jeppesen paragraph is misleading, since it will lead students to believe certain values remain constant when they really don't. In your scenario the air over the sunny area may try to increase in pressure to, for example, 14.8 lb/in^2 with surrounding air at, say, 14.7 lb/in^2. The pressure difference will cause the heated air to balloon outward till the pressures at the imaginary boundary equalize. What you get is an outflowing "wind" as the hotter air balloons out. The hot area should also cool a little. The details get ugly, but suffice to say that almost immediately after the heating begins, the volume starts expanding so the density starts dropping and the barametric pressure will appear, in this example, to be between 14.7 and 14.8. So in general if it is going to be a hot day, the air density will _tend_ to be either the same or less than on a cooler day. So wing lift and oxygen content/intake is slightly reduced on the hotter day. But dang it, nothing in physics seems to rule out weather events conspiring so that one gets a hot day and a high pressure system such that the air density is much higher than average. Such is the nature of a dynamic atmosphere that experiences unequal heating. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sailplane quiz | Mike[_8_] | Soaring | 5 | April 3rd 07 03:45 PM |
Aircraft guess quiz | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | May 6th 06 10:03 AM |
Pop Quiz | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 19 | April 26th 06 01:54 AM |
Physics question | Rich S. | Home Built | 62 | September 14th 05 02:05 PM |
Fun Quiz | John Clonts | Owning | 2 | August 14th 05 04:35 AM |