![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:55:38 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:20:22 -0700, wrote in .com: I have not seen any significant flight duration claim on the Sonex, which speaks well for the design team. I really hate to burst your bubble but, from the Sonex link above. "Initial top speeds will reach approximately 130 mph, and endurance is expected to range between 25-45 minutes or longer, depending upon power usage on each individual flight."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I also read that but "Expected to be" isn't a claim and 45 minutes is not what I would call significant duration. Would you characterize 12 seconds ad significant? http://www.thewrightbrothers.org/fivefirstflights.html The First Flight, spanning some 120 feet in 12 seconds. The next flight, Wilbur's first flight on the 17th, extended to some 175 feet in 13 seconds and a landing was accomplished with no damage to The Flyer. Orville's second attempt that day, and his last one in The Flyer, carried him just over 200 feet in 15 seconds and ended with a safe landing. At noon, Wilbur took-off on the last and the longest flight which The Flyer would ever make, and flew for 852 feet, staying aloft for 59 seconds. I would now but when the best previous powered flight it was ZERO in both time and distance anything 0 was significant. And, unfortunately, for the electric powered airplane folks they have to be compared at least to what I can build in my garage and attach a 1960's vintage Corvair engine too. Sonex's electric airplane especially has to be judged against that criteria because they already make a plane that I can build in my garage and hang a Corvair engine on. Electrically powered flight is in its infancy just as powered flight was in 1903. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Electrically powered flight is in its infancy just as powered flight was in 1903. That matters not. It still has to be compared to what it is supposed to replace. Would you want an electric car that was the technological equal to this? http://www.ausbcomp.com/~bbott/cars/cugnot.jpg. The otherside of that is that we can expect to wait until 2110 for electric flight to catch up to where we are now with gasoline powered flight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 178 | December 31st 07 08:53 PM |
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 4 | February 9th 07 01:11 PM |
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | September 22nd 06 01:50 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | July 9th 03 01:02 AM |