Turboprops exempt...oh boy!!!

We really can't assume that the Senator composed and sent the email.
That's why they have staff.

Fred F.

wrote:
We really can't assume that the Senator composed and sent the email.
That's why they have staff.

Fred F.

It doesn't matter in the least if it was her or a member staff.

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:35:35 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

It doesn't matter in the least if it was her or a member staff.

It would if the staff were chosen for their skills in relevant areas of
expertise. Sadly, the only expertise is likely along the lines of being
able to maximize dishonesty per unit time.

- Andrew

Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:35:35 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

It doesn't matter in the least if it was her or a member staff.

It would if the staff were chosen for their skills in relevant areas
of expertise. Sadly, the only expertise is likely along the lines of
being able to maximize dishonesty per unit time.

- Andrew

The point is, if the staff has been authorized to speak for her they speak
for her.

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:27:52 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

The point is, if the staff has been authorized to speak for her they speak
for her.

Of course. That's why they're picked for that particular skill.

- Andrew

Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:27:52 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

The point is, if the staff has been authorized to speak for her they
speak for her.

Of course. That's why they're picked for that particular skill.

- Andrew

Which was my original point when someone upstream tried to make an excuse
that the Senator shouldn't be blamed for things said in her name when she
authorized those who said them.