![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:13:55 -0400, Dana M. Hague
d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in : On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:58:07 GMT, Larry Dighera wrote: If a 14 HP electric propulsion system weighing 46 lbs could be constructed, apparently it would permit the use of PPGs by pilots up to 180 lbs. A PPG is a LOT more efficient than a powered parachute (PPC), but still far less efficient than a rigid wing. Still, several electric PPG's have been flown. The primary goal here is noise and vibration reduction, a worthy goal when the engine is strapped to the pilot's back. The major problem is the weight of the batteries, still far heavier than gasoline. Also the lithium polymer batteries used are still quite expensive (over $10,000 for enough for a half hour flight) and somewhat dangerous (sort them out and they can explode!) -Dana That's interesting information. Thank you. It sounds like you have quite a bit of experience in this area. Are you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this topic? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are
you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this Check this out: http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html David Johnson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 10, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote:
Are you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this Check this out:http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html David Johnson Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge and even storage. Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that could be installed in the wings of a sailplane. http://www.liposack.com/video.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The thing that strikes me most in this thread is that so many people
just don't seem to understand... 1) weight 2) power 3) scale |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:35:25 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote: I would assume that the source of these Li-ion Polymer battery fires is excessive electrical current flowing through the battery either from too high a charging rate, too high a discharge rate, or a short internal (as in the case of the Sony laptop cells) or external, or being over charged. Perhaps it would be prudent to install a circuit breaker of fuse to prevent too high a current and a timer to disconnect a forgotten charger. I imagine the root of the problem is very low internal resistance which, while making them very efficient, also allows the current to "run away". Good circuit design can alleviate many of the issues, but safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue. -Dana -- -- If replying by email, please make the obvious changes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abandon all hope, ye who PRESS ENTER here. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dana M. Hague" d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in message ... On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:35:25 GMT, Larry Dighera wrote: I would assume that the source of these Li-ion Polymer battery fires is excessive electrical current flowing through the battery either from too high a charging rate, too high a discharge rate, or a short internal (as in the case of the Sony laptop cells) or external, or being over charged. Perhaps it would be prudent to install a circuit breaker of fuse to prevent too high a current and a timer to disconnect a forgotten charger. I imagine the root of the problem is very low internal resistance which, while making them very efficient, also allows the current to "run away". Good circuit design can alleviate many of the issues, but safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue. -Dana -- Any battery chemistry, including lead-acid, can overheat with excess charging current - usually to the detriment of the battery and whatever it is in at the time. All can do damage if they are shorted. The problem with the first generation lithium cells was the chemistry released oxygen when overheated which combined with the flammable lithium made an incendiary bomb. The newest lithium-nanophosphate cells do not release oxygen and thus do not burn or explode although they can be damaged by overcharging. Cells made by A123 Systems, Saft, Valence and others are more than safe enough for use in aircraft or cars. They have a little less energy capacity than the old chemistry but they make up for it with fast charging and long life. They can typically manage a 20C discharge rate without harm - that's 200 amps for a 10 AH battery. Admittedly, you don't want to short that. Bill Daniels |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:39:44 -0400, Dana M. Hague
d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in : safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue. I would think the hazard somewhat less than gasoline. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:39:44 -0400, Dana M. Hague d(dash)m(dash)hague(at)comcast(dot)net wrote in : safety if the batteries are damaged in a crash is still an issue. I would think the hazard somewhat less than gasoline. The battery can produce it's own ignition source. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please keep in mind that there are many lithium ion and lithium polymer
chemstries. It isn't too informative to just say "Lithium Polymer" or Lithium Ion" without stating the precise chemistry. Further, chemistries are changing almost daily. Many are proprietary. There's no such thing as a "standard" lithium battery chemistry. Valence, Saft and A123 Systems use chemistries that are far safer than the relatively inexpensive Korean made model airplane batteries - safer than the typical laptop or cell phone battery which are spec'd mainly on price. Interestingly, the safest chemistries in the latest cells also offer faster charging, greater energy density and will endure a FAR greater number of charge cycles. They're also potentially cheaper. I've already made a cell holder for A123 Systems "A1" cells. That's the lithium phosphate nano cathode one used in 36V DeWalt power tools. You can buy a couple of new DeWalt 36V power packs for $50 or so on Ebay. Then, dismantle the pack to retrieve the individual cells. My pack will be 13.8 volts and 11AH weighing 3 pounds. It will be the same size as a 7AH 12V SLA but weigh less than half as much. Bill Daniels Some Lithium cells can suffer thermal runaway and fire. Others are extremely wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 10, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote: Are you able to provide links to any forums or web sites related to this Check this out:http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html David Johnson Lithium Polymer batteries are widely used in RC planes, cars, etc and are known to be potentially dangerous. Most runaway fires occur during charging but it has also occurred to a lessor degree during discharge and even storage. Vented charging safety bags are recommended for this reason. There is a video on this link that shows the explosive power of small LiPo's. Consider the size differance of these batteries to the one hung under the trike in one of the first posts or those that could be installed in the wings of a sailplane. http://www.liposack.com/video.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 178 | December 31st 07 08:53 PM |
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 4 | February 9th 07 01:11 PM |
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | September 22nd 06 01:50 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | July 9th 03 01:02 AM |