Piloting is the second most dangerous occupation

Robert M. Gary writes:

Interesting that you elected not to include a link to the actual
findings.

The CNN article didn't provide one, as far as I could tell.

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
Robert M. Gary writes:

Interesting that you elected not to include a link to the actual
findings.

The CNN article didn't provide one, as far as I could tell.


Was this right after their article on lift?

Bertie

It followed the news clip on breast feeding.

"Viperdoc" wrote in news:46beed7d$0$4686
:

It followed the news clip on breast feeding.



Ahh, OK....

bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
Robert M. Gary writes:

Interesting that you elected not to include a link to the actual
findings.

The CNN article didn't provide one, as far as I could tell.

What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to
believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with
your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence.
Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth
because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was
provided.

Judah writes:

What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to
believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with
your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence.
Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth
because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was
provided.

I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said
"according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people here.

What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by
dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the
news item that I posted. Whose fault is that?

On Aug 12, 10:02 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Judah writes:
What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to
believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with
your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence.
Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth
because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was
provided.

I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said
"according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people here.

What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by
dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the
news item that I posted. Whose fault is that?

Got Mirror?

What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by
dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the
news item that I posted. Whose fault is that?

That, I'm afraid, is an indication of how low your credibility here
has sank. Even when you post a legitimate topic, things go badly.

I personally think it's an interesting topic, but -- so far -- I have
seen no intelligent comments regarding the legitimacy of CNN's
research.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Mxsmanic,

What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by
dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the
news item that I posted. Whose fault is that?


Yours. You have done everything to let your credibility and standing to this
level. Despite ample advice on how to save your sorry behind.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Mxsmanic wrote in
:


I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said
"according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people
here.

Generally speaking, when people quote a source, it is to support their own
opinions, or an opinion which they are representing.