![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() Robert M. Gary writes: Interesting that you elected not to include a link to the actual findings. The CNN article didn't provide one, as far as I could tell. What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence. Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was provided. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence. Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was provided. I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said "according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people here. What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the news item that I posted. Whose fault is that? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 12, 10:02 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Judah writes: What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence. Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was provided. I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said "according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people here. What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the news item that I posted. Whose fault is that? Got Mirror? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by
dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the news item that I posted. Whose fault is that? That, I'm afraid, is an indication of how low your credibility here has sank. Even when you post a legitimate topic, things go badly. I personally think it's an interesting topic, but -- so far -- I have seen no intelligent comments regarding the legitimacy of CNN's research. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the news item that I posted. Whose fault is that? Yours. You have done everything to let your credibility and standing to this level. Despite ample advice on how to save your sorry behind. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said "according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people here. Generally speaking, when people quote a source, it is to support their own opinions, or an opinion which they are representing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:20:58 +0200, Martin
wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:02:02 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: Judah writes: What I find interesting is this: You have expressed that you choose not to believe anything published online by pilots unless it is already in line with your existing preconceived notions - even in the face of supporting evidence. Yet you believe (and even spread) information presented online as truth because it was published by CNN, even though no supporting documentation was provided. I never said anything about what I believed or didn't believe. I said "according to." I thought the news item would be of interest to people here. What I find interesting is that almost this entire thread is consumed by dscussion of me and personal attacks against me, rather than discussion of the news item that I posted. Whose fault is that? It happens to you on every group you post to. Hmmmmm.... (scratching head) That's really strange. I mean, what are the odds?? -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Those *dangerous* Korean War relics | Kingfish | Piloting | 192 | June 19th 06 07:06 PM |
reporting dangerous aircraft | [email protected] | General Aviation | 4 | October 20th 05 09:15 AM |
Okay, so maybe flying *is* dangerous... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 51 | August 31st 05 03:02 AM |
Dangerous Stuff | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 21 | July 16th 05 05:55 PM |
Flying - third most dangerous occupation | David CL Francis | Piloting | 16 | October 22nd 03 02:38 AM |