![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's sort of like a neighbor of mine who was complaining
about the price of gas - his SUV only gets 12MPG. I suggested he think about pushing his 6000 pound truck 12 miles by hand. That would give him the proper respect for the energy in a gallon of gasoline - and its value. Liquid petroleum fuels are extremely energy dense. It's going to be really hard to replace that with electricity. But maybe not impossible. Bill Daniels For many applications a better 'alternative energy' might be to squeeze the maximum available power out of existing technology. Below is an engine which uses the heat from combustion to add another power stroke to an engine. Its not electrically powered but in the future it may compete with electric engines. http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/ c1609351d9092110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html Name: Steam-o-Lene Engine Inventor: Bruce Crower Cost to Develop: $1,000 Time: 1.5 years Prototype | | | | | Product Bruce Crower's Southern California auto-racing parts shop is a temple for racecar mechanics. Here's the flat eight-cylinder Indycar engine that won him the 1977 Louis Schwitzer Award for racecar design. There's the Mercedes five-cylinder engine he converted into a squealing supercharged two-stroke, just 'to see what it would sound like,' says the now half-deaf 77-year-old self-taught engineer. Crower has spent a lifetime eking more power out of every drop of fuel to make cars go faster. Now he's using the same approach to make them go farther, with a radical six-stroke engine that tops off the familiar four-stroke internal-combustion process with two extra strokes of old- fashioned steam power. A typical engine wastes three quarters of its energy as heat. Crower's prototype, the single-cylinder diesel eight-horsepower Steam-o-Lene engine, uses that heat to make steam and recapture some of the lost energy. It runs like a conventional four-stroke combustion engine through each of the typical up-and-down movements of the piston (intake, compression, power or combustion, exhaust). But just as the engine finishes its fourth stroke, water squirts into the cylinder, hitting surfaces as hot as 1,500°F. The water immediately evaporates into steam, generating a 1,600-fold expansion in volume and driving the piston down to create an additional power stroke. The upward sixth stroke exhausts the steam to a condenser, where it is recycled into injection water. Crower calculates that the Steam-o-Lene boosts the work it gets from a gallon of gas by 40 percent over conventional engines. Diesels, which are already more efficient, might get another 5 percent. And his engine does it with hardware that already exists, so there's no waiting for technologies to mature, as with electric cars or fuel cells. 'Crower is an innovator who tries new ideas based on his experience and gut instincts,' says John Coletti, the retired head of Ford's SVT high- performance group. 'Most people won't try something new for fear of failure, but he is driven by a need to succeed.' And he just might. Crower has been keeping the details of his system quiet, waiting for a response to his patent application. When he gets it, he'll pass off the development process to a larger company that can run with it, full- steam. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Warning: A boring essay on obsolete internal combustion technology follows.
A merging of steam and internal combustion is probably the first "hybrid" with the first efforts dating from the beginning of the last century. The pinacle of its development was the monster water-injected turbo-compound radial engines developed late in WWII. Water injection acts is several favorable ways. First, somewhat as described below, it flashes into steam to increase the cylinder pressure and then escapes through the exhaust valves to a pressure recovery turbine which transmits its power back to the crankshaft through a fluid coupling - the "turbo compound" part. Water also cools the cylinder allowing more fuel/air mixtue to be forced into it. Finally, and this not widely known, water is even more effective than tetraethyl lead in decreasing the tendency of the fuel/air mixture to detonate or pre-ignite thus allowing far higher boost pressures. The only compound more effective than water is nitros oxide. Both Allied and Axis ari forces used water injection but only Germany used nitros oxide. Either could double an engines power for as long as the supply of H2O or NO lasted. But, on a power to weight basis, avgas easily wins so water injection was only used for takeoff or when maximum military power was needed to escape an enemy. The citation for the above is a very old engineering textbook titled "High Speed Internal Combustion Engines" by Sir Harry Recardo. I highly recomend it if you are at all interested in IC engines. Sir Harry's work on sleeve valve engines is particularly interesting. I could be wrong but I would guess that water injection gets 90% of the benifits possible without the major modification to the engine required by Bruce Crower's "6-stroke". Bill Daniels "Steve Davis" wrote in message ... It's sort of like a neighbor of mine who was complaining about the price of gas - his SUV only gets 12MPG. I suggested he think about pushing his 6000 pound truck 12 miles by hand. That would give him the proper respect for the energy in a gallon of gasoline - and its value. Liquid petroleum fuels are extremely energy dense. It's going to be really hard to replace that with electricity. But maybe not impossible. Bill Daniels For many applications a better 'alternative energy' might be to squeeze the maximum available power out of existing technology. Below is an engine which uses the heat from combustion to add another power stroke to an engine. Its not electrically powered but in the future it may compete with electric engines. http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/ c1609351d9092110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html Name: Steam-o-Lene Engine Inventor: Bruce Crower Cost to Develop: $1,000 Time: 1.5 years Prototype | | | | | Product Bruce Crower's Southern California auto-racing parts shop is a temple for racecar mechanics. Here's the flat eight-cylinder Indycar engine that won him the 1977 Louis Schwitzer Award for racecar design. There's the Mercedes five-cylinder engine he converted into a squealing supercharged two-stroke, just 'to see what it would sound like,' says the now half-deaf 77-year-old self-taught engineer. Crower has spent a lifetime eking more power out of every drop of fuel to make cars go faster. Now he's using the same approach to make them go farther, with a radical six-stroke engine that tops off the familiar four-stroke internal-combustion process with two extra strokes of old- fashioned steam power. A typical engine wastes three quarters of its energy as heat. Crower's prototype, the single-cylinder diesel eight-horsepower Steam-o-Lene engine, uses that heat to make steam and recapture some of the lost energy. It runs like a conventional four-stroke combustion engine through each of the typical up-and-down movements of the piston (intake, compression, power or combustion, exhaust). But just as the engine finishes its fourth stroke, water squirts into the cylinder, hitting surfaces as hot as 1,500°F. The water immediately evaporates into steam, generating a 1,600-fold expansion in volume and driving the piston down to create an additional power stroke. The upward sixth stroke exhausts the steam to a condenser, where it is recycled into injection water. Crower calculates that the Steam-o-Lene boosts the work it gets from a gallon of gas by 40 percent over conventional engines. Diesels, which are already more efficient, might get another 5 percent. And his engine does it with hardware that already exists, so there's no waiting for technologies to mature, as with electric cars or fuel cells. 'Crower is an innovator who tries new ideas based on his experience and gut instincts,' says John Coletti, the retired head of Ford's SVT high- performance group. 'Most people won't try something new for fear of failure, but he is driven by a need to succeed.' And he just might. Crower has been keeping the details of his system quiet, waiting for a response to his patent application. When he gets it, he'll pass off the development process to a larger company that can run with it, full- steam. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 8:10 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Warning: A boring essay on obsolete internal combustion technology follows. A merging of steam and internal combustion is probably the first "hybrid" with the first efforts dating from the beginning of the last century. The pinacle of its development was the monster water-injected turbo-compound radial engines developed late in WWII. Water injection acts is several favorable ways. First, somewhat as described below, it flashes into steam to increase the cylinder pressure and then escapes through the exhaust valves to a pressure recovery turbine which transmits its power back to the crankshaft through a fluid coupling - the "turbo compound" part. Water also cools the cylinder allowing more fuel/air mixtue to be forced into it. Finally, and this not widely known, water is even more effective than tetraethyl lead in decreasing the tendency of the fuel/air mixture to detonate or pre-ignite thus allowing far higher boost pressures. The only compound more effective than water is nitros oxide. Both Allied and Axis ari forces used water injection but only Germany used nitros oxide. Either could double an engines power for as long as the supply of H2O or NO lasted. But, on a power to weight basis, avgas easily wins so water injection was only used for takeoff or when maximum military power was needed to escape an enemy. The citation for the above is a very old engineering textbook titled "High Speed Internal Combustion Engines" by Sir Harry Recardo. I highly recomend it if you are at all interested in IC engines. Sir Harry's work on sleeve valve engines is particularly interesting. I could be wrong but I would guess that water injection gets 90% of the benifits possible without the major modification to the engine required by Bruce Crower's "6-stroke". Bill Daniels "Steve Davis" wrote in message ... It's sort of like a neighbor of mine who was complaining about the price of gas - his SUV only gets 12MPG. I suggested he think about pushing his 6000 pound truck 12 miles by hand. That would give him the proper respect for the energy in a gallon of gasoline - and its value. Liquid petroleum fuels are extremely energy dense. It's going to be really hard to replace that with electricity. But maybe not impossible. Bill Daniels For many applications a better 'alternative energy' might be to squeeze the maximum available power out of existing technology. Below is an engine which uses the heat from combustion to add another power stroke to an engine. Its not electrically powered but in the future it may compete with electric engines. http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/ c1609351d9092110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html Name: Steam-o-Lene Engine Inventor: Bruce Crower Cost to Develop: $1,000 Time: 1.5 years Prototype | | | | | Product Bruce Crower's Southern California auto-racing parts shop is a temple for racecar mechanics. Here's the flat eight-cylinder Indycar engine that won him the 1977 Louis Schwitzer Award for racecar design. There's the Mercedes five-cylinder engine he converted into a squealing supercharged two-stroke, just 'to see what it would sound like,' says the now half-deaf 77-year-old self-taught engineer. Crower has spent a lifetime eking more power out of every drop of fuel to make cars go faster. Now he's using the same approach to make them go farther, with a radical six-stroke engine that tops off the familiar four-stroke internal-combustion process with two extra strokes of old- fashioned steam power. A typical engine wastes three quarters of its energy as heat. Crower's prototype, the single-cylinder diesel eight-horsepower Steam-o-Lene engine, uses that heat to make steam and recapture some of the lost energy. It runs like a conventional four-stroke combustion engine through each of the typical up-and-down movements of the piston (intake, compression, power or combustion, exhaust). But just as the engine finishes its fourth stroke, water squirts into the cylinder, hitting surfaces as hot as 1,500°F. The water immediately evaporates into steam, generating a 1,600-fold expansion in volume and driving the piston down to create an additional power stroke. The upward sixth stroke exhausts the steam to a condenser, where it is recycled into injection water. Crower calculates that the Steam-o-Lene boosts the work it gets from a gallon of gas by 40 percent over conventional engines. Diesels, which are already more efficient, might get another 5 percent. And his engine does it with hardware that already exists, so there's no waiting for technologies to mature, as with electric cars or fuel cells. 'Crower is an innovator who tries new ideas based on his experience and gut instincts,' says John Coletti, the retired head of Ford's SVT high- performance group. 'Most people won't try something new for fear of failure, but he is driven by a need to succeed.' And he just might. Crower has been keeping the details of his system quiet, waiting for a response to his patent application. When he gets it, he'll pass off the development process to a larger company that can run with it, full- steam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The reference in Sir Harry Recardo's book to doubling HP with water injection and Nitrous Oxide could lead someone to believe that those two ingredients were all that was needed. There is no advantage to injecting water into a conventional normally aspirated 4-stroke IC engine although an endless array of systems to do so has been sold to the unwary. Water or water/alcohol injection however has long been known to do an excellent job of reducing combustion temperatures thereby preventing detonation. While this is of little importance in a normally aspirated engine it is a big help in forced induction engines. I have used both water and water/alcohol in two turbocharged motorcycle engines over a 15-year period with very good results. Dyno results have not shown any measurable added HP from the water alone (possibly because the water displaces some air/fuel mixture) but it allows a significant increase in boost pressure, which can add a bunch. Any engine dependent on this scheme for detonation protection will however self-destruct in short order should the water flow stop. Nitrous Oxide injection provides more oxygen, which in turn allows more fuel to be added which is the source of the extra HP. Crower's Steam-o-Lene is another matter. Think I'll wait until they go into mass production. It must have an interesting exhaust sound. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 178 | December 31st 07 08:53 PM |
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Home Built | 191 | August 21st 07 12:29 AM |
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | September 22nd 06 01:50 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | July 9th 03 01:02 AM |