![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil" wrote IF these can be made practical, they sound ideal for use in an airplane. They are light, and they can be shaped in just about any way to fit inside the airframe. Suppose they were integrated into the airframe and wings such that a large percentage of the airplane consisted of battery. It might be possible to get enough capacity there for a practical general aviation electric plane. I can see the headlines, now. Plane (or car) crashes, and the car's structure electrocutes the occupants. g -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Phil" wrote IF these can be made practical, they sound ideal for use in an airplane. They are light, and they can be shaped in just about any way to fit inside the airframe. Suppose they were integrated into the airframe and wings such that a large percentage of the airplane consisted of battery. It might be possible to get enough capacity there for a practical general aviation electric plane. I can see the headlines, now. Plane (or car) crashes, and the car's structure electrocutes the occupants. g LOL! These paper batterise are light because they are so small. By the time they make a battery will a few megawatts capacity, it's NOT going to be all that light. Lighter than Lead/Acid? Probably. But light enough to fly? It might be a while... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 17, 2:19 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
"Phil" wrote IF these can be made practical, they sound ideal for use in an airplane. They are light, and they can be shaped in just about any way to fit inside the airframe. Suppose they were integrated into the airframe and wings such that a large percentage of the airplane consisted of battery. It might be possible to get enough capacity there for a practical general aviation electric plane. I can see the headlines, now. Plane (or car) crashes, and the car's structure electrocutes the occupants. g -- Jim in NC I know you're only half serious, but yes, that would have to be considered. That's a risk in hybrid autos as well. EMTs and firefighters are taking special training to handle the wrecks of these cars. And the gasoline we use for our current airplanes poses the risk of incinerating the occupants in a crash. I am not sure that an electric plane would actually pose more risk. I would think that the increased reliability of the propulsion system would decrease the risk overall. How many people are killed every year in crashes caused by engine failures? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil" wrote I know you're only half serious, Yep, only half, until you really start to think about it. but yes, that would have to be considered. That's a risk in hybrid autos as well. EMTs and firefighters are taking special training to handle the wrecks of these cars. And the gasoline we use for our current airplanes poses the risk of incinerating the occupants in a crash. I am not sure that an electric plane would actually pose more risk. I think there is a higher risk, perhaps by many times. Ever seen a LiPo Battery have a catestrophic failure? One of the primary ways a LiPo can be caused to fail in that way is physical damage. Ask the electric RC guys. Most of them would never think of putting even a slightly physically damaged LiPo back into service, unless it was a really cheap plane that they wanted to see destroyed. Now imagine a battery many thousands (or even a few hundred) times larger, and larger capacity to match. I'll take my chances with the gasoline fire, thanks, ANY day. That speaks nothing of the chance of electrocution, or chemical burns or injury due to the cell's chemestry. I would think that the increased reliability of the propulsion system would decrease the risk overall. How many people are killed every year in crashes caused by engine failures? How much more reliable is an electric of that size ( to run a decent sized airplane with decent performance) and power going to be, especially if it is designed with lightness as a major design consideration? That remains yet to be seen. OK, even if we give the electric a given reliability superiority, that is not going to save all that many lives. Most power failures in I.C. powered airplanes are not that big of deal, and many times never even reported. Far more die due to stupid pilot tricks (a broad spectrum category to lump a bunch of other things together) than loss of power. Nope, lots of problems to consider before we start considering an electric aircraft. Lots more than we can maybe even consider, at the moment, even if we were to figure out a way to make a practical airplane electric powered, don't you think? -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 18, 12:24 am, "Morgans" wrote:
Nope, lots of problems to consider before we start considering an electric aircraft. Lots more than we can maybe even consider, at the moment, even if we were to figure out a way to make a practical airplane electric powered, don't you think? -- Jim in NC Oh, definitely. We are nowhere near a practical electric airplane. But I think the potential is there (no pun intended), and I hope they keep working on it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 178 | December 31st 07 08:53 PM |
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 4 | February 9th 07 01:11 PM |
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | September 22nd 06 01:50 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | July 9th 03 01:02 AM |