A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NTSB Accidents & Incidents



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 07, 02:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default NTSB Accidents & Incidents

john smith wrote:
In article v5Pxi.1658$6h3.1418@trndny05,
"Mike Isaksen" wrote:

N377CT
The pilot stalled it 12 feet above the runway and dropped it in,
breaking the landing gear off. Monday, July 24, ~ 10:30 AM CDT.
The folks in the CT told me they were going to strip everything out of
it and reinstall them in new airframe.

OK,... I'm having a dejavu moment here. At this summer's AOPA open house I
talked with a Pete K from JabiruUSA about their new LSA, and as part of the
sales pitch he does a little "salesman type trash talking" about the CTSW
next door. Mentions that he's on the ASTM commitee and that some of the EURO
companies may have played a little loose with the numbers when they upped
the GW from Euro-Microlight to US-LSA. He specifically told me to keep an
eye out for landing accidents. Now this is the second CT incident I hear
about this summer, and I personally saw the results of an Evektor prop
strike at KHWV.

Anyone else notice any pattern forming? I really think the LSA is the future
of recreational aviation so I'm hoping not.


I wouldn't claim any pattern.
The guy stalled it 12 feet off the deck.
Tower had asked him to extend farther down the runway. Instead of adding
power, he pulled back on the stick.

I still think this satisfies the "substantial damage" portion of 830.
What is not substantial when the airframe is disgarded?


Disgarded???

Matt
  #2  
Old August 19th 07, 03:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 393
Default NTSB Accidents & Incidents

In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote:

I still think this satisfies the "substantial damage" portion of 830.
What is not substantial when the airframe is disgarded?


Disgarded???


Discarded. Hey, it was late when I typed that!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Physiology and accidents Bill Daniels Soaring 7 May 30th 07 02:14 PM
Aviation incidents [email protected] Piloting 2 June 22nd 06 06:45 AM
Accidents Big John Piloting 3 December 14th 05 01:19 PM
Accidents happen... Manuel Piloting 26 November 28th 04 11:32 AM
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 18th 03 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.