Least Expensive Plane To Buy and Own

EridanMan wrote:
That is the nature of renting. Unless you are flying 100-150 hours per
year renting is going to save you a lot of money and be more
predictable.

Owning carries implicitly 'you _will_ fly more' however, at least it
has for me. "You should only buy if your fly 100 hours or more per
year" isn't necessarily the best advice, unless your schedule is such
that you _cant_ fly more than 100-150 hours a year.

What is the deal with emphasizing so much? It is really annoying and
doesn't add anything to your message.

Matt

Matt Whiting wrote:
: EridanMan wrote:
: That is the nature of renting. Unless you are flying 100-150 hours per
: year renting is going to save you a lot of money and be more
: predictable.
:
: Owning carries implicitly 'you _will_ fly more' however, at least it
: has for me. "You should only buy if your fly 100 hours or more per
: year" isn't necessarily the best advice, unless your schedule is such
: that you _cant_ fly more than 100-150 hours a year.

: What is the deal with emphasizing so much? It is really annoying and
: doesn't add anything to your message.

: Matt

I thought it was *really* annoying and doesn't add *anything* to the message?

;-)

--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
* Electrical Engineering *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote:
: EridanMan wrote:
: That is the nature of renting. Unless you are flying 100-150 hours per
: year renting is going to save you a lot of money and be more
: predictable.
:
: Owning carries implicitly 'you _will_ fly more' however, at least it
: has for me. "You should only buy if your fly 100 hours or more per
: year" isn't necessarily the best advice, unless your schedule is such
: that you _cant_ fly more than 100-150 hours a year.

: What is the deal with emphasizing so much? It is really annoying and
: doesn't add anything to your message.

: Matt

I thought it was *really* annoying and doesn't add *anything* to the message?

;-)


I'd comment, but my experience with Ph.D.s (I work with a lot of them)
is that they aren't teachable. :-)

Matt

: I thought it was *really* annoying and doesn't add *anything* to the message?
:
: ;-)
:

: I'd comment, but my experience with Ph.D.s (I work with a lot of them)
: is that they aren't teachable. :-)

: Matt

Already taught as much as will fit, eh?

--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
* Electrical Engineering *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

wrote:
: I thought it was *really* annoying and doesn't add *anything* to the message?
:
: ;-)
:

: I'd comment, but my experience with Ph.D.s (I work with a lot of them)
: is that they aren't teachable. :-)

: Matt

Already taught as much as will fit, eh?


:-)

That don't call it Piled Higher and Deeper for nothing! :-)

Matt

"Matt Whiting" wrote:

Piled Higher and Deeper

Heh.

Haven't heard that one since the '60s.

--
Dan
T-182T at BFM

What is the deal with emphasizing so much? It is really annoying and
doesn't add anything to your message.

One of those gremlins of a bad habit that shows up when I don't
sufficiently self-censor myself. I apologize, and thank you for
calling me on it.

-Scott