![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
wrote: I am contemplating buying an airplane mostly for business trips, but I know a 172 or something like that will not stand the test of time since I frequently travel to Wichita and the headwinds are brutal sometimes. I have been thinking about a Mooney or Bonanza but I wonder if I am setting myself up for trouble since I have less than 100 hours logged. Do you think I would be less safe in such an airplane, or would some extra training be sufficient? A complex, high performance airplane will be more demanding than a Skyhawk, but why buy an airplane that may dissapoint you with its suitability for the missions you fly? Don't buy an airplane you can't really use. There's no reason a 100-hour pilot cannot operate a Bonanza or Mooney safely if he gets enough training to be proficient. An more in insurance costs with low time. My opinion only. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |
More on High Performance Insurance | Jay Honeck | Owning | 25 | December 15th 03 03:24 AM |
High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |
High performance | Chris Gumm | Piloting | 6 | August 9th 03 06:07 PM |