A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Am I an idiot? Low experience; high performance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 30th 07, 02:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default Am I an idiot? Low experience; high performance

That's the killer, I guy I know just picked up a really, really nice
V35 Bonanza for 50K since the owner was getting premium quotes of
14-18K. I ran my numbers though AOPA and came up with $930 per year,
hull and liability.

Bush

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:52:20 -0700, wrote:

I am contemplating buying an airplane mostly for business trips, but I
know a 172 or something like that will not stand the test of time
since I frequently travel to Wichita and the headwinds are brutal
sometimes.

I have been thinking about a Mooney or Bonanza but I wonder if I am
setting myself up for trouble since I have less than 100 hours logged.

Do you think I would be less safe in such an airplane, or would some
extra training be sufficient?


  #2  
Old August 31st 07, 06:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Am I an idiot? Low experience; high performance

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:05:55 -0500, Bush
wrote:

That's the killer, I guy I know just picked up a really, really nice
V35 Bonanza for 50K since the owner was getting premium quotes of
14-18K. I ran my numbers though AOPA and came up with $930 per year,
hull and liability.


Mine runs about $1600 for 80 grand with Hull, liability, and medical.
However it takes 750 TT (up 50 since last year), 200 retract, 20 or 25
make and model, and an instrument rating (also new) for some one else
to fly it unless they are a named pilot. Adding a named pilot with
1800 TT with no (fender benders) and instrument rated, but only 20 in
retract was nearly $500


Bush

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:52:20 -0700, wrote:

I am contemplating buying an airplane mostly for business trips, but I
know a 172 or something like that will not stand the test of time
since I frequently travel to Wichita and the headwinds are brutal
sometimes.

I have been thinking about a Mooney or Bonanza but I wonder if I am


The Mooney is much more efficient, but the Bo is more comfortable with
seats setting up high like chairs.

setting myself up for trouble since I have less than 100 hours logged.

Do you think I would be less safe in such an airplane, or would some
extra training be sufficient?


That is determined by attitude and training. With a good attitude and
training (take the American Bonanza Society and Air Safety Pilot
Proficiency course) if you go that route. I'd bet there is something
similar for the Mooney.

Good Luck,

Roger
  #3  
Old August 31st 07, 07:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Howard Nelson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Am I an idiot? Low experience; high performance


"Roger (K8RI)" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:05:55 -0500, Bush
wrote:

That's the killer, I guy I know just picked up a really, really nice
V35 Bonanza for 50K since the owner was getting premium quotes of
14-18K. I ran my numbers though AOPA and came up with $930 per year,
hull and liability.


Mine runs about $1600 for 80 grand with Hull, liability, and medical.
However it takes 750 TT (up 50 since last year), 200 retract, 20 or 25
make and model, and an instrument rating (also new) for some one else
to fly it unless they are a named pilot. Adding a named pilot with
1800 TT with no (fender benders) and instrument rated, but only 20 in
retract was nearly $500


These premiums seem pretty low. What liability limits are we talking about?
Smooth or per injured party? 2 million liability with 100K per person might
be pretty inexpensive in a 4 passenger aircraft whereas 2 million smooth
might be pretty expensive in a 2 passenger aircraft. In the first case the
company is extending 400,000 in insurance and in the second extending
2,000,000 in insurance.
Howard


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance R.T. Owning 22 July 6th 04 08:04 AM
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... Dave S Home Built 8 June 2nd 04 04:12 PM
More on High Performance Insurance Jay Honeck Owning 25 December 15th 03 03:24 AM
High performance homebuilt in the UK NigelPocock Home Built 0 August 18th 03 08:35 PM
High performance Chris Gumm Piloting 6 August 9th 03 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.