![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've never flown a Bo so I don't know what is flaps characteristics are,
but if the flaps mainly add drag and don't lower the stall speed appreciable, then using them for takeoff would make little sense. The Arrow performed only marginally better when using flaps for takeoff. The Skylane was a whole different airplane with flaps 20 on takeoff. The deck angle was amazing and the climb speed substantially reduced. Yep, horsepower makes all the difference. In our 150 hp Piper Warrior, adding flaps for takeoff was something we did cuz we were told to do so -- but they didn't really make much difference. That plane just daintily floated off the ground (and back ON the ground, when landing) no matter what the flap setting. Our 235 hp Piper Pathfinder is WAY different. With 2 notches of flaps, on a cool day, you can just hang on the prop and see nothing but sky. It'll leap off the ground much faster with than without flaps. Which is why I'm surprised to hear of a high-horsepower plane like the Bonanza that DOESN'T use flaps for takeoff. When I saw the video, I thought for sure that was the reason for the crash. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:25:47 -0700, Jay Honeck
wrote: Which is why I'm surprised to hear of a high-horsepower plane like the Bonanza that DOESN'T use flaps for takeoff. When I saw the video, I thought for sure that was the reason for the crash. Normal takeoff for the Malibu (dual-turbo 350hp Lycoming) is no flap. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which is why I'm surprised to hear of a high-horsepower plane like the
Bonanza that DOESN'T use flaps for takeoff. When I saw the video, I thought for sure that was the reason for the crash. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" I'd be surprised if Beech even published a short field takeoff technique for the Bonanza. I know for sure they don't for the King Air, even though at one time they did. It called for takeoff with approach flaps. I remember getting a revision to the BE90 POH that removed the short field takeoff technique. I believe it has to do with liability. Does anyone have a Bonanza POH that is actually up to date with all the revisions? I'm pretty sure the Bonanza would get in the air in less distance with approach flaps, but is probably no longer on the POH, just like the KA. Karl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() karl gruber wrote: I remember getting a revision to the BE90 POH that removed the short field takeoff technique. I believe it has to do with liability. Does anyone have a Bonanza POH that is actually up to date with all the revisions? I'm pretty sure the Bonanza would get in the air in less distance with approach flaps, Approach flaps cuts 20% off the takeoff distance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:31:22 -0700, "karl gruber"
wrote: I'd be surprised if Beech even published a short field takeoff technique for the Bonanza. I know for sure they don't for the King Air, even though at one time they did. It called for takeoff with approach flaps. None for the Sundowner or it's sisters, either. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:25:47 -0700, Jay Honeck
wrote: I've never flown a Bo so I don't know what is flaps characteristics are, but if the flaps mainly add drag and don't lower the stall speed appreciable, then using them for takeoff would make little sense. The Arrow performed only marginally better when using flaps for takeoff. The Skylane was a whole different airplane with flaps 20 on takeoff. The deck angle was amazing and the climb speed substantially reduced. Yep, horsepower makes all the difference. In our 150 hp Piper Warrior, adding flaps for takeoff was something we did cuz we were told to do so -- but they didn't really make much difference. That plane just daintily floated off the ground (and back ON the ground, when landing) no matter what the flap setting. Our 235 hp Piper Pathfinder is WAY different. With 2 notches of flaps, on a cool day, you can just hang on the prop and see nothing but sky. It'll leap off the ground much faster with than without flaps. Which is why I'm surprised to hear of a high-horsepower plane like the Bonanza that DOESN'T use flaps for takeoff. When I saw the video, I thought for sure that was the reason for the crash. Not all Bonanzas. The older ones I'm familiare with don't, but I believe the newer A36 calls for 15 degrees which airn't much. Roger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oshkosh P-51 crash video | Frank from Deeetroit | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 30th 07 06:06 PM |
S-3 Crash Video | Sanderson | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 13th 05 10:22 PM |
Orlando Crash Video | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 35 | January 21st 05 03:30 AM |
VIDEO: Helicopter crash | Micbloo | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 3rd 04 03:28 AM |
Video of crash 206 | gaylon9 | Rotorcraft | 9 | December 2nd 03 04:53 PM |