![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Sep, 15:59, Andrew Warbrick
wrote: This is mostly an attempt to rename a thread which now has NO connection whatsoever with 925's crash on Sunday. As I understand it, the British system was changed after accidents where pilots accepted a cable without being ready to go and were winched off as a result of, for example, scratching their noses. That was the claim. In reality, I think it was changed because Lasham had a new CFI who wanted to make an impact on the gliding scene. I'm all in favour of changing systems from time to time. When people have to think about what they are doing they are less likely to make accidents from unwarranted assumptions. I still don't like losing that degree of control of the launch, though. Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another fatal accident | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 06 11:50 PM |
Fatal accident in Italy | 2cernauta2 | Soaring | 1 | April 4th 06 05:50 PM |
Fatal accident near Wenatchee, WA | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | June 27th 05 01:54 AM |
Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident | Aardvark | Piloting | 44 | May 21st 04 02:34 PM |
Hawaii Fatal Accident | Rocky | Rotorcraft | 0 | July 25th 03 03:01 PM |