![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article m,
Jay Honeck wrote: He's not ATC, so there's no rap to take. Dozens of pilots on 122.8 heard someone say that a Fly Baby violated the Class B at the south end of Sea-Tac Class B. If ATC *did* notice someone cutting across the airspace and the FAA started an investigation, no doubt someone might tell them, "I heard it was a Fly Baby." If the guy making the radio call had been the guy who cut across, he's just misdirected the investigators. File the NASA form, Ron. It's cheap, easy, and may protect you. We did one, once, when Mary was dumped into Class D by an approach controller. My understanding is that if you file the form, you're maybe relieved for the thing you report. How is being relieved of responsibility for not doing anything (which I presume is what you would report) going to do any good? The alternative is to say that you _did_ do something that you didn't. Which seems like an even worse idea. Of course, if he decides he might have actually busted class B, that's a different story, but he seemed pretty certain that wasn't what happened. Mike Beede |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |