A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Approaching Deep Stall



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 6th 07, 01:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 81
Default Approaching Deep Stall

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:06:01 -0700, cjcampbell
wrote:

On Sep 5, 11:29 am, Fred the Red Shirt
wrote:
For a while I have been wondering why there seem to be no
airplanes with a low wing and a high tail.


Duchess and Seminole come to mind.


doesn't have to be a "high tail". ever heard of the Cheyenne II's
stability augmentation system? didn't really do a whole lot for
controllability, primarily made it feel like there was airflow over
the elevator when there wasn't much...

one has to be exploring the edges of the envelope, but other PA31's
are able to place the tail into "bad" air also.

TC
  #2  
Old September 6th 07, 01:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Paul kgyy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 283
Default Approaching Deep Stall

An early model of the experimental Velocity developed this problem
during testing - ended up pancaking into a canal, iirc. Pilot
suffered back injuries but survived.

  #4  
Old September 8th 07, 03:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 81
Default Approaching Deep Stall

On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:48:38 -0400, The Visitor
wrote:



wrote:
doesn't have to be a "high tail". ever heard of the Cheyenne II's
stability augmentation system?




I thought it was because of the tip tanks it had to have it.

John


nope, they've all got tip tanks. AFAIK bigger engines led to a steeper
deck angle on climb out and dirty air over the tail.

the I's don't have enuff poop to get the nose high enuff, and the XL
has a different/longer fuselage.

when the nose gets high enuff on a II, an actuator winds up the
elevator downspring so the yoke doesn't "flop". keeps the quivering
protoplasm behind the yoke from crapping him/herself when the air
leaves the elevator.

have had the same sensation in a straight 31 with a Colemill
conversion. i kinda liked it...

TC
  #5  
Old September 6th 07, 01:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default Approaching Deep Stall

On Sep 6, 12:37 am, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:06:01 -0700, cjcampbell

wrote:
On Sep 5, 11:29 am, Fred the Red Shirt
wrote:
For a while I have been wondering why there seem to be no
airplanes with a low wing and a high tail.


Duchess and Seminole come to mind.


doesn't have to be a "high tail". ever heard of the Cheyenne II's
stability augmentation system? didn't really do a whole lot for
controllability, primarily made it feel like there was airflow over
the elevator when there wasn't much...

one has to be exploring the edges of the envelope, but other PA31's
are able to place the tail into "bad" air also.


This is the sort of Zodiac-like high tail I was thinking of:

http://www.icfn.net/bluesky/air1/N70...I%20(OFEK).jpg

and this is not:

http://www.dc3d.co.nz/tutorials/OFP/...enne.lllSm.GIF

Both are what I's call a "high" tail in the sense that the horizontal
stabilizer flies at a higher altitude than does the main wing, and
hence both would seem to have the same vulnerability to
deep stall.

--

FF

  #6  
Old September 6th 07, 02:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Approaching Deep Stall

Fred the Red Shirt wrote:
On Sep 6, 12:37 am, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:06:01 -0700, cjcampbell

wrote:
On Sep 5, 11:29 am, Fred the Red Shirt
wrote:
For a while I have been wondering why there seem to be no
airplanes with a low wing and a high tail.


Duchess and Seminole come to mind.


doesn't have to be a "high tail". ever heard of the Cheyenne II's
stability augmentation system? didn't really do a whole lot for
controllability, primarily made it feel like there was airflow over
the elevator when there wasn't much...

one has to be exploring the edges of the envelope, but other PA31's
are able to place the tail into "bad" air also.


This is the sort of Zodiac-like high tail I was thinking of:

http://www.icfn.net/bluesky/air1/N70...%20PIPER%20PA-
31T%20CHEYENNE%20II%20(OFEK).jpg

and this is not:

http://www.dc3d.co.nz/tutorials/OFP/...enne.lllSm.GIF

Both are what I's call a "high" tail in the sense that the horizontal
stabilizer flies at a higher altitude than does the main wing, and
hence both would seem to have the same vulnerability to
deep stall.

FF


If that is your definition of "high" tail you don't have to leave the Zenith
line to find a low wing that fits that description take a close look at the
601XL. Not as high as the 701 but the bottom of the horz. stabilizer is
higher than the top of the wing.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Car and Deep Cycle Battery FAQ Bill Darden Home Built 0 May 28th 07 11:57 AM
ILS approaching help Syucomm Simulators 8 December 13th 06 09:58 PM
deep hole Randall Robertson Simulators 9 April 22nd 04 07:51 PM
German AUV "Deep C" robert arndt Military Aviation 0 November 25th 03 04:07 PM
Approaching BFM... Craig Prouse Piloting 5 September 26th 03 04:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.