Controller screwed up?

On Sep 11, 9:48 am, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:02:50 +0900, "donzaemon" wrote
in :

I'm not sure what the regulations technically say

Then perhaps you might consider looking up the appropriate
regulation/order instead of admitting your ignorance publicly in an a
worldwide forum.

What's wrong with admitting ignorance publicly in a worldwide forum?
Isn't that one purpose of Usenet? I admit my ignorance and get the
answers I am looking for?
No shame in that.

Ricky

"Ricky" wrote in message
ps.com...

On Sep 11, 9:48 am, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:02:50 +0900, "donzaemon" wrote
in :

I'm not sure what the regulations technically say

Then perhaps you might consider looking up the appropriate
regulation/order instead of admitting your ignorance publicly in an a
worldwide forum.


What's wrong with admitting ignorance publicly in a worldwide forum?
Isn't that one purpose of Usenet? I admit my ignorance and get the
answers I am looking for?
No shame in that.


Yeah, Larry. Lighten up a bit. Besides, I think he had a good point.

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:30:43 -0500, "Maxwell"
wrote in :

I think he had a good point.

That's because you haven't read the FAA order pertinent to the
controller's issuing the takeoff clearance. Do a little research
before you publish your opinion.

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:41:34 -0700, Ricky
wrote in om:

On Sep 11, 9:48 am, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:02:50 +0900, "donzaemon" wrote
in :

I'm not sure what the regulations technically say

Then perhaps you might consider looking up the appropriate
regulation/order instead of admitting your ignorance publicly in an a
worldwide forum.

What's wrong with admitting ignorance publicly in a worldwide forum?
Isn't that one purpose of Usenet? I admit my ignorance and get the
answers I am looking for?
No shame in that.

Ricky

When you admit you don't know what you are talking about, and freely
offer you opinion based on that lack of knowledge (as donzaemon did)
it benefits no one.

Those who drafted the charter for this newsgroup mandated that
articles posted here contain INFORMATION, not uninformed opinion.

Failure to invest the requisite effort to research a topic before
posting an article just decreases the signal-to-noise ratio in the
newsgroup.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

Those who drafted the charter for this newsgroup mandated that
articles posted here contain INFORMATION, not uninformed opinion.


Oh God forbid Larry. Do you mean to tell me someone actually posted an
uninformed opinion around here????


Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!! !!

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:42:56 -0500, "Maxwell"
wrote in :

Do you mean to tell me someone actually posted an uninformed opinion around here????

Are your expectations too low?