![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 1:06 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jeff Dougherty writes: Eh? All I had to do to get in to flight school was show up with a check in my hand. Getting in is just the beginning. The third class medical doesn't do much more than make sure you won't have a heart attack or seizure at 5,000 feet ... The medicals are excessively restrictive--reminiscent of military requirements--and archaic, disqualifying some conditions that are generally harmless while accepting others that can often be dangerous. They are also unnecessarily repetitive. Red tape is abundant in certification as well, with special procedures just for having retractable gear, excessive currency requirements, heavy regulation, and so on. It's easier to become a lawyer than it is to become a pilot, and in some respects it's easier to become a doctor as well. I agree that medicals are excessively restrictive, but that has been slowly changing. Also, based on accident records, having a special rating for retract makes perfect sense. If the FAA does not, the insurance companies will (and do) impose extra conditions for flying a retract. No, it is not easier to become a physician or a lawyer. Anyone without a serious physical handicap, about $5k of cash and average or even below average intelligence can become a pilot in a few months. Even if you are talking about becoming a professional pilot, there are places that will train you from zero for about $50k. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan writes:
I agree that medicals are excessively restrictive, but that has been slowly changing. VERY slowly changing. I figure that a private pilot is far less likely to take anyone with him if he kills himself in an accident than is an automobile driver, so why the restrictive medical requirements? A pilot's only victims are likely to be his passengers, if any, but someone crashing on the highway can cause many injuries and deaths. A good first step would be to dramatically reduce the requirements for piloting alone, while (perhaps) maintaining somewhat more stringent requirements for pilots who want to take passengers with them. However, I'm not convinced that the chances of sudden incapacitation are really high enough to worry about in any case. Also, based on accident records, having a special rating for retract makes perfect sense. If the FAA does not, the insurance companies will (and do) impose extra conditions for flying a retract. I don't think insurance should be mandatory for pilots, either. Anyone without a serious physical handicap, about $5k of cash and average or even below average intelligence can become a pilot in a few months. Even if you are talking about becoming a professional pilot, there are places that will train you from zero for about $50k. Yeah, I saw an ad for $42K. But I'm sure there are a great many prerequisites for admission to the school. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|