![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 1:37 pm, "Jon Woellhaf" wrote:
Jeff Dougherty wrote ... The third class medical doesn't do much more than make sure you won't have a heart attack or seizure at 5,000 feet ... I believe the third class medical -- or even the first class medical -- provide no assurance whatsoever that you won't have a heart attack on the way from the doctor's office to your car. Someone posted their story here a while ago about having to get a special psychiatric evaluation just because he happened to mention to the FAA that he had a psychological evaluation when he was an 5-year old (or something close to that age). There is no doubt that the FAA medical process is unnecessarily bureaucratic and has grounded too many perfectly fine pilots. A fairer system would be to do away with medicals except for those who fly for a living. Just like we do for driving. To my knowledge, it has never been proven that medical incapacitation is a leading cause of aviation accidents. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
To my knowledge, it has never been proven that medical incapacitation is a leading cause of aviation accidents. Well, that could also be interpreted as supporting the medicals: After all, medical incapacitation isn't a leading cause of aviation accidents, so the medicals must be doing a good job of preventing medical-incapacitation-caused accidents. We need data on the frequency of medical incapacitation accidents in the absence of medicals in order to really be able to make a point either way. Ad. -- The mail address works, but please notify me via usenet of any mail you send to it, as it has a retention period of just a few hours. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adhominem writes:
Well, that could also be interpreted as supporting the medicals: After all, medical incapacitation isn't a leading cause of aviation accidents, so the medicals must be doing a good job of preventing medical-incapacitation-caused accidents. We need data on the frequency of medical incapacitation accidents in the absence of medicals in order to really be able to make a point either way. We can get those numbers from automobile accidents. How many accidents are caused by sudden incapacitation of automobile drivers? How many are caused by drivers having a sudden heart attack or seizure? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|