![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Carter wrote:
During a recent discussion about calculating glide ratio, I began to wonder what the effects of pressure altitude were on the glide ratio of an aircraft. Since air is 50% as dense at FL180 as at sea level, would the glide ratio increase (glide further) as altitude decreases? AND if there is a difference in glide ratio as altitude changes, then what values do most manufacturers use when they publish their numbers (if they do)? Oh yeah, I do understand that glide ratio changes to 0:0 upon impact, so the wags can skip that part of the reply... Ratio math is good only if terrain is perfectly flat in a perfect world. You got to figure in the geography to get the actual ratio. Or...... splat A little calculus anyone??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"FredGarvinMaleProstitute" wrote in message
... Jim Carter wrote: During a recent discussion about calculating glide ratio, I began to wonder what the effects of pressure altitude were on the glide ratio of an aircraft. Since air is 50% as dense at FL180 as at sea level, would the glide ratio increase (glide further) as altitude decreases? AND if there is a difference in glide ratio as altitude changes, then what values do most manufacturers use when they publish their numbers (if they do)? Oh yeah, I do understand that glide ratio changes to 0:0 upon impact, so the wags can skip that part of the reply... Ratio math is good only if terrain is perfectly flat in a perfect world. You got to figure in the geography to get the actual ratio. Or...... splat A little calculus anyone??? Ok Fred - that's a new one. What does terrain have to do with glide ratio? I already noted that impact has an impact on the ratio, but only at point of impact. Other than that one point on the continuum, what effect could terrain have on glide ratio? And don't get started on turbulence, or wind shear, or any number of other weather anomalies, because I'm asking about glide ratio, not glide distance. -- Jim Carter Rogers, Arkansas |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "FredGarvinMaleProstitute" wrote: Ratio math is good only if terrain is perfectly flat in a perfect world. You got to figure in the geography to get the actual ratio. Or...... splat LOL. Still got a way to go to catch Mxsmanic, though. -- Dan "Did you just have a stroke and not tell me?" - Jiminy Glick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
trivia: highest glide ratio | [email protected] | Soaring | 10 | August 4th 06 09:47 PM |
So you think you have a low glide ratio! | COLIN LAMB | Soaring | 30 | January 12th 06 02:47 PM |
question on glide ratio functions in Garmin 96, 96C, 196 GPS | Steve S | Soaring | 1 | January 10th 06 07:43 PM |
GPS glide ratio calculations | james | Soaring | 0 | May 4th 04 09:00 PM |
GPS glide ratio calculations | Jason Armistead | Soaring | 16 | September 12th 03 04:50 AM |