![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:35:10 -0400, Dudley Henriques
wrote in : The Luscombe 8A (I don't believe the 8 ) had a letter of limited aerobatic capability from the CAA dated 1947 included in the aircraft's operating manual. This letter listed specific aerobatic maneuvers approved for the 8A after joint tests between Luscombe and the CAA were performed. Do you recall if snap rolls were among those maneuvers listed in that letter? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote in
: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:35:10 -0400, Dudley Henriques wrote in : The Luscombe 8A (I don't believe the 8 ) had a letter of limited aerobatic capability from the CAA dated 1947 included in the aircraft's operating manual. This letter listed specific aerobatic maneuvers approved for the 8A after joint tests between Luscombe and the CAA were performed. Do you recall if snap rolls were among those maneuvers listed in that letter? They were. I still have it. It's irrelevant in any case. Then an airplane was an airplane. Part of what an airplane did was go upside down. They thought better of that policy eventually and an aerobatic category was established, but airplanes certified before whatever date that was, (about 1950, maybe a bit earlier) were, for better or worse, exempt from any such restriction. Luscombes are tough, but not as tough as legend would have one believe. A couple have been lost over the years, but fewer than many of it's certified aerobatic brethren. It's not a particularly good aerobatic airplane. The roll rate is very slow, almost glider like. Barrel rolls are fine and it loops OK but snaps are not great especially at the relatively low entry speed of 70 mph that's recommended. Add in the multiple structural ADs the airplane has and it's not what you could call a first class aerobatic mount. I'd still loop, barrel roll and wingover a good one, but that's all. A new one would be another story.. The Taylorcraft was well able for aerobatics in stock form. Same sort fo stuff It does aileron rolls quite a lot better than the Luscombe (though it;s been many years since I've flown one, wheras I've had a Luscombe upside down recently) Modded for aerbatics with clipped wings and only a few more ponies, it's one of the best aerobatic airplanes ever made. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Greeting Cards Earn Part time.... | coolguy17111987 | Piloting | 0 | March 9th 07 04:29 PM |
EARN CASH WHILE SAVING GAS | Gas Savers | Home Built | 0 | June 29th 06 06:12 PM |
Should the USA have a soaring license, not a glider license? | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 04 07:16 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |
Help me earn my Instrument | Products | 0 | July 16th 03 07:46 AM |