A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Holding Pattern Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 07, 11:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Holding Pattern Question

Mark Hansen wrote:
On 09/24/07 20:14, Dennis Johnson wrote:
"Mark Hansen" wrote in message
...
The EFC is of use only if you experience communication failure. Assuming
that's the case, then with no EFC, you're expected to proceed upon
reaching
the holding fix as though the EFC was zero.

Thanks for the correct answer. In the meantime, I also found the answer in
AIM 91.185(c)(3)(ii):

"...leave the clearance limit at the expect further clearance time if one
has been received, or if one has not been received, ... as close as possible
to the ETA..."


Yes, and that is the answer you want to give on the exams, but in real
life, you'll find that the controllers want you out of the air as soon
as possible. They're expecting you to get on the ground asap. I wouldn't
plan on waiting for your ETA once you get to the fix...



If you really lose comm, waiting until your ETA is the correct procedure.

Matt
  #2  
Old September 25th 07, 07:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Holding Pattern Question


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

If you really lose comm, waiting until your ETA is the correct procedure.


Why?


  #3  
Old September 25th 07, 09:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Holding Pattern Question

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
If you really lose comm, waiting until your ETA is the correct procedure.


Why?


Why not?
  #4  
Old September 25th 07, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Holding Pattern Question


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Why not?


Waiting for the ETA ties up airspace and delays other aircraft.


  #5  
Old September 27th 07, 05:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
rip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Holding Pattern Question

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Why not?


Waiting for the ETA ties up airspace and delays other aircraft.


ATC won't clear anyone into your block of airspace until after your EFC
time to prevent two aircraft in IMC from using the same space.

Rip
  #6  
Old September 27th 07, 06:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default Holding Pattern Question

rip wrote:
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Waiting for the ETA ties up airspace and delays other aircraft.

ATC won't clear anyone into your block of airspace until after your EFC
time to prevent two aircraft in IMC from using the same space.


The discussion is about ETA, not EFC.
  #7  
Old September 27th 07, 10:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Holding Pattern Question



rip wrote:


ATC won't clear anyone into your block of airspace until after your EFC
time to prevent two aircraft in IMC from using the same space.



Non radar only.


  #8  
Old September 28th 07, 03:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Holding Pattern Question

In article ,
rip wrote:

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Why not?


Waiting for the ETA ties up airspace and delays other aircraft.


ATC won't clear anyone into your block of airspace until after your EFC
time to prevent two aircraft in IMC from using the same space.

Rip


Sure they will. You land, find a phone, call 1-800-WX-BRIEF and say, "This
is N12345, on the ground at KXYZ, cancel IFR".
  #9  
Old September 27th 07, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
rip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Holding Pattern Question

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
If you really lose comm, waiting until your ETA is the correct procedure.


Why?


Because you own the block of airspace assigned to you. Someone else owns
the block of airspace ahead of and behind you. You wait until your EFC
time so that you don't blunder into the guy ahead in IFR conditions.

Rip
  #10  
Old September 27th 07, 06:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default Holding Pattern Question

rip wrote:

Because you own the block of airspace assigned to you. Someone else owns
the block of airspace ahead of and behind you. You wait until your EFC
time so that you don't blunder into the guy ahead in IFR conditions.


When you go NORDO ATC is going to clear everyone else out of your way.
Just get on the ground and relieve ATC of their misery.

DGB
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bose X - $995 and holding... [email protected] Piloting 23 November 30th 05 12:57 AM
Holding pattern reporting Yossarian Instrument Flight Rules 14 July 4th 05 10:57 AM
Stupid Newbie Pattern Question Lakeview Bill Piloting 76 June 11th 05 02:54 PM
Holding at CHS Stuart King Instrument Flight Rules 3 November 10th 03 07:52 PM
Holding Pattern Entries Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 17 July 11th 03 05:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.