![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not really, and I'd be surprised if you could taxi a Citabria with the tailwheel raised anyway. Easy in a cub, though. Firstly this isnt a troll and if somebody feels it is, they simply need to ignore it, thats how usenet works. Anyways, the question was based more on what I saw on the takeoff run where we raise the tail as airspeed increases. It just felt more stable and more like a conventional gear takeoff run in that phase, so I was just wondering. The intent of the question wasn't about how to taxi at a high speed. The problem with the Citabria is it's a bit too easy for tailwheel conversion. You'll get the basics, but if you try a cub afterwards you'll find it significantly more difficult, wheras the other way around would be a piece of cake. Citabria is a good airplane, but it's not the best tailwheel trainer for that reason. However, it will certainly do in a pinch! Thanks for the tip, I have been looking to find a place to learn in a cub but the closest one is about 70 miles away, so that may have to wait. The CG doesn't change significantly when the tail is raised, though, to answer your question, and fast taxiing is something best left to someone with a LOT of tailwhel time. Taxiing on the mains is something best left to airshow pilots or guys that can afford to replace props as easily as they would buy a cup of coffee. What my instructor seemed to imply (and things didn't really sink in till about a day after the flying) was that the takeoff roll is more stable when the tail is up. So I was wondering if the CG shifts forward when the tail is raised because this is a more stable configuration than when the CG is behind the main wheels. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 12:39 pm, wrote:
Not really, and I'd be surprised if you could taxi a Citabria with the tailwheel raised anyway. Easy in a cub, though. Firstly this isnt a troll and if somebody feels it is, they simply need to ignore it, thats how usenet works. Anyways, the question was based more on what I saw on the takeoff run where we raise the tail as airspeed increases. It just felt more stable and more like a conventional gear takeoff run in that phase, so I was just wondering. The intent of the question wasn't about how to taxi at a high speed. The problem with the Citabria is it's a bit too easy for tailwheel conversion. You'll get the basics, but if you try a cub afterwards you'll find it significantly more difficult, wheras the other way around would be a piece of cake. Citabria is a good airplane, but it's not the best tailwheel trainer for that reason. However, it will certainly do in a pinch! Thanks for the tip, I have been looking to find a place to learn in a cub but the closest one is about 70 miles away, so that may have to wait. The CG doesn't change significantly when the tail is raised, though, to answer your question, and fast taxiing is something best left to someone with a LOT of tailwhel time. Taxiing on the mains is something best left to airshow pilots or guys that can afford to replace props as easily as they would buy a cup of coffee. What my instructor seemed to imply (and things didn't really sink in till about a day after the flying) was that the takeoff roll is more stable when the tail is up. So I was wondering if the CG shifts forward when the tail is raised because this is a more stable configuration than when the CG is behind the main wheels. OK, I'm just a student pilot, and not a taildragger student either. But I know a little physics. The CG is still behind the mains even with the tail up. It is possible that the airplane would feel more stable in yaw when it is accelerating, however. Since the center of gravity is being pulled along behind the propeller, I would think the airplane would tend to stay in line. This ignores other influences like crosswinds and the torque effects of the prop which would tend to counter this. And it won't help you in taxiing when you are moving at a constant speed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() OK, I'm just a student pilot, and not a taildragger student either. But I know a little physics. The CG is still behind the mains even with the tail up. It is possible that the airplane would feel more stable in yaw when it is accelerating, however. Since the center of gravity is being pulled along behind the propeller, I would think the airplane would tend to stay in line. This ignores other influences like crosswinds and the torque effects of the prop which would tend to counter this. And it won't help you in taxiing when you are moving at a constant speed. Yes, you are right about the CG not changing, I was probably mistakenly thinking that the CG moves forward relative to the ground as the airplane nose is "lowered" but I think that's not correct. The stability in a level attitude while taxing probably also comes from the fact that the P-factor is gone and there is no turning tendency any more. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 25, 11:37 pm, wrote:
OK, I'm just a student pilot, and not a taildragger student either. But I know a little physics. The CG is still behind the mains even with the tail up. It is possible that the airplane would feel more stable in yaw when it is accelerating, however. Since the center of gravity is being pulled along behind the propeller, I would think the airplane would tend to stay in line. This ignores other influences like crosswinds and the torque effects of the prop which would tend to counter this. And it won't help you in taxiing when you are moving at a constant speed. Yes, you are right about the CG not changing, I was probably mistakenly thinking that the CG moves forward relative to the ground as the airplane nose is "lowered" but I think that's not correct. The stability in a level attitude while taxing probably also comes from the fact that the P-factor is gone and there is no turning tendency any more. Thrust acts along the centerline whether the airplane is tracking straight or not, whether the CG is behind the mains or in front. The only time thrust is a little off is when the AOA is high (tail low) and the downgoing blade has more pull (P-factor). The airplane will still want to pull left with the tail up due to the swirl of the prop slipstream striking the left side of the fin, and a small amount caused by more pressure on the left main due to engine torque reaction. Raising the tail will make the nose swerve left, a gyroscopic precession caused by the prop's rotating mass. Whatever the airplane tries to do, you have to be ready for it and not afraid to use ALL the controls rather aggressively to show it who's boss. It won't fly itself. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd RFD: remove rec.aviation.questions moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Jim Riley | Piloting | 0 | March 10th 07 09:41 AM |
2nd RFD: remove rec.aviation.questions moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Jim Riley | Owning | 0 | March 10th 07 09:41 AM |
2nd RFD: remove rec.aviation.questions moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Jim Riley | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | March 10th 07 09:41 AM |
2nd RFD: remove rec.aviation.questions moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | The Big-8 Management Board | General Aviation | 0 | March 10th 07 05:50 AM |
wanted scott 3200 tailwheel /alaskan bushwheel tailwheel | phillip9 | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | June 6th 06 07:57 PM |