![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:18:21 GMT, "william cogswell"
wrote: "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message news:blosl3$jie$1 "QDurham" wrote in message ... How do you put 'her' down? It seems to have happened to 3 ex FAA aircrew yesterday when they had to ditch their Cessna 172 after its engine failed over the Western Channel All 3 were picked up by a fishing boat and one reported having to make an underwater escape from the sinking aircraft Given that the youngest of them was 79 they did rather well I alos seem too have seen some footage of several cessna 172 type a/c ditching, The one that stands out the gentelman made a beautiful ditching the a/c pitched forward but reamained upright for several minutes Of course now you can buy a chute for your AIRPLANE! I don't know if any of you have seen them, but they mount on top of the wing, and are controlled from the cockpit. They were originally designed for Cessna drivers going over the Sierra, where the "margin for error" is about zero. If used by someone flying over water they would allow for a zero airspeed ditching. Al Minyard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Minyard wrote:
Of course now you can buy a chute for your AIRPLANE! I don't know if any of you have seen them, but they mount on top of the wing, and are controlled from the cockpit. They were originally designed for Cessna drivers going over the Sierra, where the "margin for error" is about zero. If used by someone flying over water they would allow for a zero airspeed ditching. We've been flying with Ballistic Recovery Systems (BR$) on light sport aircraft for many years. The Cessna 172, -152, Cirrus, etc. BR$ chutes for GA aircraft are relatively new: http://www.airplaneparachutes.com/BRS29.htm Lots of pros/cons to the BR$ issue. The priceless value of human life aside, any chute large enough to lower a Cessna 172 plus humans/baggage, etc. to earth is probably worth more $$$ than the 172 itself (unless it's a brand new '03 $kyhawk Millenium). Backpack parachutes are essentially worthless in my line of business (due to the low altitudes and inability free yourself the debris of the aircraft crumpling around you) however, I'm comfortable flying with or without a ballistic chute on my bird. I've owned two of them and to me they're 1) pricy 2) heavy and, 3) dangerous (folks have survived the crash only to die screaming in the treetops while being burned by the pyrotechnics). An ACES, Martin Baker even a Weber or Yankee extraction system would sure be nice to have, tho. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike Marron wrote: (folks have survived the crash only to die screaming in the treetops while being burned by the pyrotechnics) What pryotechnics? The charge that deployed the chute? That is expended when the chute is fired. Sounds like urban legend. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |
Landing gear door operation | Elliot Wilen | Military Aviation | 11 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |