![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMHO it's not only the weight but the height, there's a big difference
between pulling the yoke back when you are 20 inches away and 10 inches away. I know. Margy Jim Macklin wrote: Gender has nothing that must cause the problem, but a 102 pound female has to work harder to push the 150 pounds on the rudder pedal that is what is required to match the Vmc numbers, or to pull or push the elevator when the trim is run-away or just miss-set. And the typical two place trainer has a narrow CH envelope and most multiengine airplanes have a wide CG range, when only the front seats are occupied, elevator forces will be greater. Lots of farms girls and city raised girls who get into horses, learn very quickly that a 70# hay bale can be moved, with effort. Then they learn that the exercise makes them stronger and the bales seem easier to move. I was just telling the young lady, that using the trim for the flare, below 1.3 Vso may get her killed and it won't increase her upper body strength. There are males with low strength and there are females with high strength. But the aerodynamic facts are gender neutral, if you trim right down to stall speed and have to do a go-around, you are asking to die if you don't have the strength. There is a maneuver that can be done safely at altitude in most airplanes, a trim stall. "john hawkins" wrote in message et... | I'm not sure what gender has to do with it. I know that my daugher, who is a | competion horse rider can toss hay bales around a whole lot better than I | can. and i can flare and land a nose heavy A36 just fine. | | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | ... | Live long and prosper. There are a number of NTSB reports | that involve female pilots involved in fatal accidents in | various makes and models. Often these involve Vmc | demonstrations and other operations such as engine out | go-around [not required in light twins, but a required | maneuver in transport category/jets.] | | | "Michelle P" | wrote in message ... | | Jim Macklin wrote: | | There are some airplanes that are easy to load outside | the | | flight envelope. Many multiengine airplanes are | designed to | | carry passengers and baggage. With only the front seats | | occupied, some ballast in the rear can be essential. | | | | You should read some FAR 23 on flight control forces | | allowed. | | | | I have a few thousand hours teaching in multiengine | aircraft | | and just flying charter and delivery, from Piper Aztecs, | | Beech Duchess and Barons, Dukes, King Ai r 90, 200 and | 300. | | Jet time is in the Beechjet 400, trust me, your life can | | depend on your being able to push and pull the controls | to | | the limit with one leg or one hand. | | | | I bow to your godliness..almighty one. | | Michelle | | | | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Margy Natalie" wrote IMHO it's not only the weight but the height, there's a big difference between pulling the yoke back when you are 20 inches away and 10 inches away. I know. I think I am following your thought, but I'm not sure. Are you saying your height (or lack of it ;-) puts you so close to the yoke (10 inches) that the closeness makes it much more difficult to pull hard on the yoke? I'm assuming that the pedals on the Navion are not adjustable, and that is what puts you so close to the yoke? -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Margy Natalie" wrote IMHO it's not only the weight but the height, there's a big difference between pulling the yoke back when you are 20 inches away and 10 inches away. I know. I think I am following your thought, but I'm not sure. Are you saying your height (or lack of it ;-) puts you so close to the yoke (10 inches) that the closeness makes it much more difficult to pull hard on the yoke? I'm assuming that the pedals on the Navion are not adjustable, and that is what puts you so close to the yoke? You hit the nail on the head. It's not bad in the Navion, but a 182 is a ****er for me. It's one reason we have a Navion, but yes, I still sit rather close. Margy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very true, full travel is required. That can be difficult
with short legs and arms. "Margy Natalie" wrote in message m... | IMHO it's not only the weight but the height, there's a big difference | between pulling the yoke back when you are 20 inches away and 10 inches | away. I know. | | Margy | | Jim Macklin wrote: | Gender has nothing that must cause the problem, but a 102 | pound female has to work harder to push the 150 pounds on | the rudder pedal that is what is required to match the Vmc | numbers, or to pull or push the elevator when the trim is | run-away or just miss-set. And the typical two place | trainer has a narrow CH envelope and most multiengine | airplanes have a wide CG range, when only the front seats | are occupied, elevator forces will be greater. | | Lots of farms girls and city raised girls who get into | horses, learn very quickly that a 70# hay bale can be moved, | with effort. Then they learn that the exercise makes them | stronger and the bales seem easier to move. | | I was just telling the young lady, that using the trim for | the flare, below 1.3 Vso may get her killed and it won't | increase her upper body strength. | | There are males with low strength and there are females with | high strength. But the aerodynamic facts are gender | neutral, if you trim right down to stall speed and have to | do a go-around, you are asking to die if you don't have the | strength. | | There is a maneuver that can be done safely at altitude in | most airplanes, a trim stall. | | | | "john hawkins" wrote in message | et... | | I'm not sure what gender has to do with it. I know that my | daugher, who is a | | competion horse rider can toss hay bales around a whole | lot better than I | | can. and i can flare and land a nose heavy A36 just fine. | | | | | | "Jim Macklin" wrote | in message | | ... | | Live long and prosper. There are a number of NTSB | reports | | that involve female pilots involved in fatal accidents | in | | various makes and models. Often these involve Vmc | | demonstrations and other operations such as engine out | | go-around [not required in light twins, but a required | | maneuver in transport category/jets.] | | | | | | "Michelle P" | | wrote in message | ... | | | Jim Macklin wrote: | | | There are some airplanes that are easy to load | outside | | the | | | flight envelope. Many multiengine airplanes are | | designed to | | | carry passengers and baggage. With only the front | seats | | | occupied, some ballast in the rear can be essential. | | | | | | You should read some FAR 23 on flight control forces | | | allowed. | | | | | | I have a few thousand hours teaching in multiengine | | aircraft | | | and just flying charter and delivery, from Piper | Aztecs, | | | Beech Duchess and Barons, Dukes, King Ai r 90, 200 | and | | 300. | | | Jet time is in the Beechjet 400, trust me, your life | can | | | depend on your being able to push and pull the | controls | | to | | | the limit with one leg or one hand. | | | | | | I bow to your godliness..almighty one. | | | Michelle | | | | | | | | | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Going for my Multiengine rating | Kobra | Piloting | 34 | October 10th 07 02:23 PM |
Going for my Multiengine rating | Kobra | Owning | 29 | October 10th 07 02:23 PM |
Going for my Multiengine rating | Kobra | Products | 3 | September 23rd 07 03:56 AM |
Multiengine Rating | [email protected] | Piloting | 79 | January 25th 07 06:58 PM |
rotorcraft commercial rating or better rating advice | Rick Cook | Rotorcraft | 0 | October 13th 03 04:49 PM |