![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Harding wrote in message ...
Brian Sharrock wrote: From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable, which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth that even studies the American Revolution. While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was, it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ZZBunker" wrote in message om... Stephen Harding wrote in message ... Brian Sharrock wrote: From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable, which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth that even studies the American Revolution. Please tell your programmers that although they've 'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to auto-respond;- _Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning a person from Britain. While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was, it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War. Once again, although your words imply an acceptance of the hypothesis that the regrettable conflict in the North American colonies _was_ a civil war between essentially British participants - until the overt involvement of French arms and funding - 'we' do not normally refer to that rebellion in the colonies as a British Civil War. [The 'British' civil war, that is a war involving all of the nations comprising 'Britain , fought on the soil of Ireland is considered to have reached an apex (or nadir) at the Battle of the Boyne where a different bunch of Frenchies, and sundry Hollanders, seemed to have been involved. I'm not sure of the attitude of the contemporary colonists in North America to these ,presumably, far-off events. The colonists seemed to have gone with the flow and not exhibited any desire to retain their presumed allegiances to the Stuart Monarchs that had granted them charters] -- Brian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Sharrock wrote:
"ZZBunker" wrote in message But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable, which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth that even studies the American Revolution. Please tell your programmers that although they've 'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to auto-respond;- _Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning a person from Britain. Since you mention it, does British English actually support the word "adjectival"? While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was, it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War. [...] The colonists seemed to have gone with the flow and not exhibited any desire to retain their presumed allegiances to the Stuart Monarchs that had granted them charters] Well ancestors on my fathers side of the family "went with the flow" to Virginia after Charles lost his head. Cromwell didn't seem too well disposed towards loyalists any more than American revolutionaries it would seem. SMH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... snip Since you mention it, does British English actually support the word "adjectival"? It seems so; we were forever 'analysing sentences into 'adjectival', 'adverbial' clauses and phrases et. seq. One day I'm sure the exercises will prove to have been useful as the Teachers spent so much time on the process. -- Brian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Sharrock" wrote in message ...
"ZZBunker" wrote in message om... Stephen Harding wrote in message ... Brian Sharrock wrote: From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable, which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth that even studies the American Revolution. Please tell your programmers that although they've 'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to auto-respond;- _Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning a person from Britain. Well, I have to. Since the only thing I've ever refused to do even more than have my local skyscrapers knocked down by Middle Easters is to take spelling lessons from moron Britons. If you get a chance you can relay the message for me to King James via King Louis XIV, Henry VIII, and Napolean that they were all more morons than any of the King Georges. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Sharrock" wrote in message ...
"ZZBunker" wrote in message om... Stephen Harding wrote in message ... Brian Sharrock wrote: From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable, which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth that even studies the American Revolution. Please tell your programmers that although they've 'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to auto-respond;- _Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning a person from Britain. While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was, it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War. Once again, although your words imply an acceptance of the hypothesis that the regrettable conflict in the North American colonies _was_ a civil war between essentially British participants - Nobody ever said if was a conflict between British participants. Since if you idiots didn't know, by that time the U.S. Consitution was already in place. And we weren't waiting around for something as stupid as a Euro-Commie-NAZI-constitution to be written by idiots with an Einstein, a few Swiss chocolate clocks, some Belgium courts, German music, and Chinese medical supplies. until the overt involvement of French arms and funding - 'we' do not normally refer to that rebellion in the colonies as a British Civil War. We know. Since the only thing Britian does call a British Civil War has something to do with a worn out institution called Parliament. [The 'British' civil war, that is a war involving all of the nations comprising 'Britain , fought on the soil of Ireland is considered to have reached an apex (or nadir) at the Battle of the Boyne where a different bunch of Frenchies, and sundry Hollanders, seemed to have been involved. I'm not sure of the attitude of the contemporary colonists in North America to these ,presumably, far-off events. That's quite impossible, since Ireland has never even had an army to have a battle against. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe | Chris | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | December 19th 04 09:40 PM |