A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

French block airlift of British troops to Basra



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 8th 03, 09:02 AM
ZZBunker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stephen Harding wrote in message ...
Brian Sharrock wrote:

From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the
horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that
there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British
colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a
republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the


But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable,
which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth
that even studies the American Revolution.

While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was,
it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War.
  #2  
Old October 8th 03, 11:11 AM
Brian Sharrock
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ZZBunker" wrote in message
om...
Stephen Harding wrote in message

...
Brian Sharrock wrote:

From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the
horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that
there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British
colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a
republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the


But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable,
which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth
that even studies the American Revolution.

Please tell your programmers that although they've
'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to
auto-respond;-
_Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning
a person from Britain.

While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was,
it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War.


Once again, although your words imply an acceptance of
the hypothesis that the regrettable conflict in the North American
colonies _was_ a civil war between essentially British participants -
until the overt involvement of French arms and funding - 'we'
do not normally refer to that rebellion in the colonies as a
British Civil War. [The 'British' civil war, that is a war involving
all of the nations comprising 'Britain , fought on the soil of Ireland
is considered to have reached an apex (or nadir) at the Battle of
the Boyne where a different bunch of Frenchies, and sundry Hollanders,
seemed to have been involved. I'm not sure of the attitude of the
contemporary colonists in North America to these ,presumably, far-off
events.
The colonists seemed to have gone with the flow and not exhibited
any desire to retain their presumed allegiances to the Stuart Monarchs
that had granted them charters]

--

Brian





  #3  
Old October 8th 03, 01:46 PM
Stephen Harding
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Sharrock wrote:

"ZZBunker" wrote in message

But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable,
which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth
that even studies the American Revolution.

Please tell your programmers that although they've
'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to
auto-respond;-
_Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning
a person from Britain.


Since you mention it, does British English actually support the word
"adjectival"?

While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was,
it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War.


[...]

The colonists seemed to have gone with the flow and not exhibited
any desire to retain their presumed allegiances to the Stuart Monarchs
that had granted them charters]


Well ancestors on my fathers side of the family "went with the flow"
to Virginia after Charles lost his head.

Cromwell didn't seem too well disposed towards loyalists any more
than American revolutionaries it would seem.


SMH
  #4  
Old October 8th 03, 05:29 PM
Brian Sharrock
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...
snip

Since you mention it, does British English actually support the word
"adjectival"?

It seems so; we were forever 'analysing sentences into 'adjectival',
'adverbial' clauses and phrases et. seq. One day I'm sure the
exercises will prove to have been useful as the Teachers spent
so much time on the process.

--

Brian



  #5  
Old October 8th 03, 05:53 PM
ZZBunker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Brian Sharrock" wrote in message ...
"ZZBunker" wrote in message
om...
Stephen Harding wrote in message

...
Brian Sharrock wrote:

From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the
horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that
there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British
colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a
republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the


But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable,
which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth
that even studies the American Revolution.

Please tell your programmers that although they've
'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to
auto-respond;-
_Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning
a person from Britain.


Well, I have to. Since the only thing I've ever refused
to do even more than have my local skyscrapers knocked
down by Middle Easters is to take spelling lessons from moron
Britons. If you get a chance you can relay the message
for me to King James via King Louis XIV, Henry VIII,
and Napolean that they were all more morons
than any of the King Georges.
  #6  
Old October 8th 03, 10:21 PM
ZZBunker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Brian Sharrock" wrote in message ...
"ZZBunker" wrote in message
om...
Stephen Harding wrote in message

...
Brian Sharrock wrote:

From your side of the Atlantic, I suppose everybody over the
horizon seems to be 'Euro', but to me, a Briton, the idea that
there'' some kind of "Euro spin" over the rebellion of some British
colonists funded by the French Kingdom in the furtherance of a
republic is laughable. I know it's probalby hard to examine the


But, as fate would have it Briton has always found that laughable,
which is why they're about the only nation left on Earth
that even studies the American Revolution.

Please tell your programmers that although they've
'got' the parsing part of whatever is driving you to
auto-respond;-
_Briton_ is not a nation but an adjectival word meaning
a person from Britain.

While if you ask most Americans what the US's big war was,
it would be the US Civil War, not the British Civil War.


Once again, although your words imply an acceptance of
the hypothesis that the regrettable conflict in the North American
colonies _was_ a civil war between essentially British participants -


Nobody ever said if was a conflict between British participants.
Since if you idiots didn't know, by that time the
U.S. Consitution was already in place. And we weren't waiting
around for something as stupid as a Euro-Commie-NAZI-constitution
to be written by idiots with an Einstein, a
few Swiss chocolate clocks, some Belgium courts,
German music, and Chinese medical supplies.

until the overt involvement of French arms and funding - 'we'
do not normally refer to that rebellion in the colonies as a
British Civil War.


We know. Since the only thing Britian does call
a British Civil War has something to do with
a worn out institution called Parliament.


[The 'British' civil war, that is a war involving
all of the nations comprising 'Britain , fought on the soil of Ireland
is considered to have reached an apex (or nadir) at the Battle of
the Boyne where a different bunch of Frenchies, and sundry Hollanders,
seemed to have been involved. I'm not sure of the attitude of the
contemporary colonists in North America to these ,presumably, far-off
events.


That's quite impossible, since Ireland has never even had an army
to have a battle against.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe Chris Instrument Flight Rules 43 December 19th 04 09:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.