![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
You are offering to pay for lunch at a place of the others choosing, etc and that makes it a "for pay operation requiring a commercial certificate. But surely this wouldn't qualify; the purchase of lunch is both incidental and coincidental to the act of flying; neither the act of flying nor the purchase of lunch must necessarily and/or inevitably follow the other, obviating the comp/hire clause? You could be nicked on the paying of rental/loggable time (good will applies), but not the hamburgers! ![]() TheSmokingGnu |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheSmokingGnu wrote:
You could be nicked on the paying of rental/loggable time (good will applies), but not the hamburgers! ![]() I wouldn't think you could be tagged for providing the plane. The safety pilot would be a required crewmember for the operation, not a passenger. If such were the case, then nobody could fly with a safety pilot in their own plane (or a rented one) unless the safety pilot shared costs. I don't think that's the case. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
236,147 private pilots | Dallas | Piloting | 15 | July 13th 07 10:43 PM |
Safety Pilots? | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | February 14th 07 02:15 AM |
Safety Pilots? | Wizard of Draws | Piloting | 1 | February 13th 07 05:03 AM |
Private Pilots Examination | Albert Ng | Piloting | 6 | February 24th 05 10:01 AM |
Older Pilots and Safety | Bob Johnson | Soaring | 5 | May 21st 04 01:08 AM |