A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Osprey Goes to War



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 4th 07, 11:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Walt[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default The Osprey Goes to War

So it comes down to the ability to auto rotate versus lack of that
ability (Once you get hit...)?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


It is a confluence of things.

If you try and fly it without escorts you'll get hit. You'll need to
auto-rotate.

If you try and descend at a constant rate into a zone you'll get hit.
You'll need to auto-rotate.

If you don't have effective armament on the bird you'll get hit.
You'll need to auto-rotate.

So it is is ignoring these vulnerability factors and saying, "We'll
ignore even the modicum of survivabilty provided by auto-rotation."

The ability to auto-rotate was originally required, but it was
dropped.

I wonder how many retired Marines are making 2-3 times (or more) of
their retirement pay to work on this thing.

It is the poster child for problems with the Military-Industrial-
Complex of the type that Eisenhower warned about.

Walt

  #2  
Old October 4th 07, 06:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
BlackBeard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default The Osprey Goes to War

On Oct 4, 3:08 am, Walt wrote:
So it comes down to the ability to auto rotate versus lack of that
ability (Once you get hit...)?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


It is a confluence of things.

If you try and fly it without escorts you'll get hit. You'll need to
auto-rotate.

If you try and descend at a constant rate into a zone you'll get hit.
You'll need to auto-rotate.

If you don't have effective armament on the bird you'll get hit.
You'll need to auto-rotate.


Your statements make a false assumption that poor susceptability =
poor survivability. They are two different subsections of the overall
vulnerability of the platform. Flight parameters/performance can
certainly make a platform more susceptable to receiving hostile fire.
However the survivability of the platform is determined by completely
different parameters. Every hit does not mean a mission kill.


I wonder how many retired Marines are making 2-3 times (or more) of
their retirement pay to work on this thing.


Unfortunately probably about the same number as the Admirals that
pushed for NMCI .
:/

BB

I guess everybody has some mountain to climb.
It's just fate whether you live in Kansas or Tibet...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Osprey 2 modifications Terry Mortimore Home Built 5 October 23rd 04 11:46 PM
Osprey icing tests Ed Majden Military Aviation 0 February 1st 04 08:43 PM
Amphib: Coot vs Osprey II Greg Milligan Home Built 9 December 29th 03 01:48 AM
Osprey tested in air, at sea Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 10th 03 12:30 AM
Osprey vs. Harrier Stephen D. Poe Military Aviation 58 August 18th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.