![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What killed the World Class was the World Class.
When the PW5 was awarded the World Class against a lot of opposition to the design the proponents of the PW5 sat back fielding criticism and smugly snubbed the others even after it was well apparent that few were going to get on their band wagon. Others that contended for the bid to be the world class glider and their followers were shut out and left with no place to compete. There were other good design entrants (most thought better than the committee picked PW5) and rumors of unfair politics deciding on the PW5 clouded the class. How the PW5 was picked over the other designs remains a topic of some controversy but it was and it failed to gather the interest of the masses (it really is homely) but there were however many other gliders that were in contention for the title sold that already meet much the original design criteria. If these models were all lumped together with the existing PW5 gliders the potential is there for a successful competition class to yet emerge.... Call it World Class or whatever you like but stick with the gliders already produced and there is no need to go through the process another time only to end up with the same dismal results. There is no need to start including Grob Astirs, Cirrus, LS4 and the likes of these since they already fit nicely into the Club Class (The USA needs also to finally adopt the rest of the worlds "Club Class" and "Racing Class" rather than continuing to disguise Ventus 2's and ASW27's and the likes as "Sports class" gliders)and there is no reason to start looking for a new alternative "World Class" design... Simply include the L-33's, SZD solo, Russia in with the PW5's and let them fight it out in a fair and balanced contest.....choose your weapon and go into battle..... low cost, lower performance racing.....easy enough. tim -- Please visit the Wings & Wheels website at www.wingsandwheels.com , "Ian Cant" wrote in message ... Soon we will see a very good 13m glider ....for $120,000.-only. And the happy owner will be a World Class Champion. Was that an original idea behind the World Class? If I recall correctly, the major aim of the World Class concept was to make competition soaring more accessible by keeping the cost down. The lower performance level and the single-design concepts arose from this aim [one design to allow mass production and the savings therefrom]. Unfortunately the masses did not buy the PW-5. Perhaps a reasonable class could be built from all the 13m and below sailplanes that are now around, typically with 30 or 35:1 L/Ds and easier retrieve characteristics than bigger ships. A set of rules can be built around the existing designs without denying entry to newer and better designs. Contrary to advertised beliefs, 30:1 is plenty for X-C [20:1 is plenty for the 1-26 guys]. But how do we keep the cost under control ? Well, my only semi-facetious suggestion would be to have a rule that the top three in any National-level contest have to offer their ships, fully equipped as flown, for sale at a fixed price immediately afterwards. Take $40,000 as a random number. Will anyone really want to buy a championship with a $60,000 ship if he has to sell it for $40,000 afterwards ? It would be snapped up. But the $20,000 ship that wins would probably not be sellable at $40,000 and the owner could keep it to fly another day. As a reference point, the Sparrowhawk is perhaps the highest performance 13m ship around, and I believe it still sells for below $40,000. And my aging Russia would be competitive; it cost me $19,000 new a few years ago; even with a trailer and flight recorder and oxygen etc and CA sales tax, it still came in at well below $25,000. It could be done. With 60 or so Russias, maybe 50 PW-5s, a growing number of Sparrowhawks and a sprinkling of Apis and Silents we should have a viable nucleus of a fleet. And if it works, more people may be enticed to join in affordable competive soaring. Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here, Here Tim:
The Club Class has definitely stepped up and filled the performance/ price niche the orginal World Class was meant to fill in the soaring contest world. Club Class around the world offers some of the most competitive racing in the world right now, in ships that more pilots can afford - especially inthe US given the Euro/$ rate now. Every country in the world offers Club Class racing except the US (and maybe Canada?). Why are we so stubbornly against the concept, while we still devote the time and effort to site a World Class Nationals every year? Yes, some rules makers have said to me : "well look at the Club Class in Europe, with all of its highly modified Cirruses, etc., that will just mean pilots will take $20K Cirruses and trick them out for $40K , and then where is the affordability?" I was once of that thought. But after having seen the 3rd French Pilot in a run-of-the mill Std Cirrus place 3rd at Club Worlds ahead of the supposedly tricked out Cirrus' the top two French pilots flew, I just do not think that is much of an issue. There is only so much you can do with Cirrus, Libelles, etc. And now that the IGC Club Class list is adding the Discus (and like ships) to the list of ships allowed, the Club class alows a huge portion of the US fleet of gliders to compete at a high level again. Isn't that a good thing? Oh, and even if it takes $40k to trick out and old ship to be fully competitive, I've still saved a good number 10's of thousands of $'s with which I can compete at more contests. Isn't the possibility of increased contest participation a good thing as well? Others have said to me: "why should I have to purchase an old Libelle to compete in a contest where I can make the US Team?" And good/great pilots (often younger) who can only afford crappy gliders or who's dads don't have a D2 for them to fly should have to buy $100k new ships to compete on an even palying field in the only handicapped class the US offers pilots? The concept of the US Sports Natioanls has outlived its usefullness - other than to offer pilots more options of flying a nationals each year. If I own a new ASW-15 meter ship, my nationals should be the 15 meter class. If I own a Schempp-Std Class glider my nationals should be Stds Nationals. If I own a whatever-Open Class ship, I might be clamoring for a handicapped Open Class to attract more ships to that nationals since Sports Class does not cater to me at all. etc. But if I own a Libelle, or Elfe, or whatever older ship, I am S.O.L. for my own Nationals. The current Sports Class Nationals has become a joke for entry level racing here in the US - unless you can afford to buy a brand new ship and start racing it as a newbie, OR you can find a glider that has not been raced in the last 20-30 years and has an overly generous handicap so you can try and "work" the current system. Otherwise, you need to depend on a lot of luck fromt he weather gods and superior pilot skills to have any hope of winning. Instead Sports Class has become just another "option" for pilots of the latest and best ships. Many pilots I am sure say: "Well, I own an ASW-50, my nationals is in XXX. I don't like XXX, but Sports Nationals is in a place I do like... I might as well just fly Sports Nats and maybe even pick up a high nationals placing since the tasking is, after all, more and more set up for ships like mine because that is (mostly) who goes to it anymore." Keep the Sports Class at the regional level - its fun to race agaisnt others outside of your class and to learn in, BUT give US pilots their own Club Class Nationals like everyone else in the world has! Let the World Class, as a separate nationals, die quietly and maybe set up an A and B Club Class Nationals system and give the US soaring population a Club Class Nationals to fill the entry level/affordable/ very competitive contest niche. Tim McAllister EY On Oct 4, 11:44 am, "Tim Mara" wrote: What killed the World Class was the World Class. When the PW5 was awarded the World Class against a lot of opposition to the design the proponents of the PW5 sat back fielding criticism and smugly snubbed the others even after it was well apparent that few were going to get on their band wagon. Others that contended for the bid to be the world class glider and their followers were shut out and left with no place to compete. There were other good design entrants (most thought better than the committee picked PW5) and rumors of unfair politics deciding on the PW5 clouded the class. How the PW5 was picked over the other designs remains a topic of some controversy but it was and it failed to gather the interest of the masses (it really is homely) but there were however many other gliders that were in contention for the title sold that already meet much the original design criteria. If these models were all lumped together with the existing PW5 gliders the potential is there for a successful competition class to yet emerge.... Call it World Class or whatever you like but stick with the gliders already produced and there is no need to go through the process another time only to end up with the same dismal results. There is no need to start including Grob Astirs, Cirrus, LS4 and the likes of these since they already fit nicely into the Club Class (The USA needs also to finally adopt the rest of the worlds "Club Class" and "Racing Class" rather than continuing to disguise Ventus 2's and ASW27's and the likes as "Sports class" gliders)and there is no reason to start looking for a new alternative "World Class" design... Simply include the L-33's, SZD solo, Russia in with the PW5's and let them fight it out in a fair and balanced contest.....choose your weapon and go into battle..... low cost, lower performance racing.....easy enough. tim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 6, 4:10 am, Tim wrote:
Yes, some rules makers have said to me : "well look at the Club Class in Europe, with all of its highly modified Cirruses, etc., that will just mean pilots will take $20K Cirruses and trick them out for $40K , and then where is the affordability?" Really nobody "tricks out" their gliders. Everybody seals their glider properly but that doesn't cost much. If you add winglets (~ $2,000) or wing-root fillets (which probably don't work unless you've done wind tunnel time) you get extra handicap, so it doesn't make any difference, and so pilots don't bother. Certainly nobody is spending tens of thousands of dollars, not even close. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: PW-5 World Class Sailplane | Mike I Green[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | May 11th 07 05:30 AM |
FS: PW-5 World Class Sailplane | Mike I Green[_2_] | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | May 1st 07 04:50 PM |
Is everybody afraid of World Class? | Jacek Kobiesa | Soaring | 79 | August 27th 04 10:47 PM |
Is everybody afraid of World Class ... | Dead Cat | Soaring | 1 | August 23rd 04 11:21 AM |
US Standard Class and World Class Nationals at Hobbs | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 7 | July 16th 04 04:03 AM |