![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 4, 4:46 pm, "Gatt" wrote: expects everybody to do experiments just to indulge your accusation that basically everything they know about aerodynamics is wrong. Not true. I do not recall any "accusation that basically everything they know about aerodynamics is wrong." I wrote that there are some things in the Jeppensen book that are just plain wrong, as is the explanation of action/reaction with regard to downwash. Oh, nevermind, everybody. It's the same guy with a new handle. It's Jeppesen, and, do you have any idea how many people are successfully flying with what they learned from the Jeppesen books? Are you one of them? What has IT got to do with a war? My writings were very specific, involving aerodynamics. What I'm saying is, until you prove your aerodynamics with something more than two sheets of paper, nobody gives a damn. Here's a hint: We don't fly sheets of paper or plywood. If you think it can be done, all you have to do is build an airplane and demonstrate it. I did. The answer was "yes, the book is right, and you are wrong." Accept it and move on. Don't just change your handle and try again. -c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 5:20 pm, "Gatt" wrote:
"Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in ooglegroups.com... Oh, nevermind, everybody. It's the same guy with a new handle. It's My handle has been the same for over a decade. Jeppesen, and, do you have any idea how many people are successfully flying with what they learned from the Jeppesen books? Are you one of them? Not yet. I will continue to study my Jeppesen book. That does not mean that I will blindly accept everything I read. What has IT got to do with a war? My writings were very specific, involving aerodynamics. What I'm saying is, until you prove your aerodynamics with something more than two sheets of paper, nobody gives a damn. Here's a hint: We don't fly sheets of paper or plywood. If you think it can be done, all you have to do is build an airplane and demonstrate it. I did. The answer was "yes, the book is right, and you are wrong." Accept it and move on. Don't just change your handle and try again. My handle has been the same for over a decade. And I will do as I please, thanks. -Le Chaud Lapin- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le Chaud Lapin wrote in
ups.com: On Oct 4, 5:20 pm, "Gatt" wrote: "Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in ooglegroups.com... Oh, nevermind, everybody. It's the same guy with a new handle. It's My handle has been the same for over a decade. Jeppesen, and, do you have any idea how many people are successfully flying with what they learned from the Jeppesen books? Are you one of them? Not yet. I will continue to study my Jeppesen book. That does not mean that I will blindly accept everything I read. Wel, if you do ever leave your bedroom and take a flying lesson that will turn out to be some CO2 pumped into the atmosphere for nothing. At least your instructor will make enough to supersize off you. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA advisory voids IFR certification for GPS's!!! | Prime | Owning | 12 | May 29th 07 01:43 AM |
Brass or copper sheet? | Scott | Home Built | 11 | October 15th 06 02:20 AM |
4130 sheet | log | Home Built | 4 | September 1st 04 01:42 AM |
Day 2 New Castle Score Sheet | Guy Byars | Soaring | 3 | September 25th 03 02:39 AM |
S-H Spars: Anyone check for voids laterally? | Mark Grubb | Soaring | 1 | September 20th 03 04:27 AM |