![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote Borchert would argue that black-eyed beans are really black-eyed peas, just for the sake of arguing. His arguing a point has little to do with anything, real or imagined, other than that he enjoys the sound of his own voice. As for you looking for "proof" that rough-handling an engine isn't worse for it than treating it with kid gloves, well, Dan, I don't know what to tell ya. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. Jay, I think you would agree that I am not an overly argumentative person, and that I'm a pretty fair wrench turn'er. (remember me putting in a transmission into my van, in the field at Oshkosh? g) What Dudlley said in the next post is pretty much my view on the whole thing. Quote by The Dud: It's the smooth management of temps and pressures up and down that's important, and this means strict focus on how power is transitioned from idle to full and visa versa. End quote. On the subject of going from idle to full power, that covers it all. If you treat the engine with the temp and pressure in mind, it really does not care if it changes RPM often. All day long if you wanted to. Exceeding cylinder pressure limits wear the piston, rings, and cylinders, and put extra strain on the rod and main bearings. Think of it like this. If you are cruising along at cruise with the engine making 70% power, that is still a lot of HP being made, and pressure is being applied to all of the moving parts of the engine, and a lot of it, at that. If you accelerate an engine nicely, you do not put as much pressure on it, and it is not making as much HP as it would be subjected to at cruise power settings. Therefore it won't hurt the engine, following those guidelines. The problem with training planes is that renters don't apply the power smoothly, or watch the temperatures, and end up lugging it, and putting extra pressure on everything. THAT is what hurts engines that are going from low power to high power. You care about the life of your engine, and if you are aware of possible pitfalls, you will not hurt your engine. In conclusion, I would agree that unless you can come up with real numbers on how touch and goes and such, hurt your engine, I don't think it is a -given- that low power to high power cycles hurt the engine. If you don't exceed the cylinder pressures and temperatures, it can't do anything bad, because the engine is -designed- to output much higher amounts of power for extended periods of time, and all in an engine that is designed to make its power at very conservative HP to Cubic Inch levels. This isn't a dragster, or road racer, making 1 1/2 ot 2 HP per cubic inch, but an engine only putting out around 1/2 HP per cubic inch. These are very sustainable power levels. Here's something I know we all agree on: I will endeavor to practice engine-out procedures more often -- and (as opposed to our training days) I will also endeavor to apply power slowly and carefully at the end of that looooong glide. That's a good thing, I guess, and if nothing else, it will probably make you and Mary safer pilots. Happy flights! -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scared of mid-airs | Frode Berg | Piloting | 355 | August 20th 06 05:27 PM |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |