A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

My wife getting scared



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 6th 07, 10:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default My wife getting scared

Jay,

Perhaps (and, no offense, of course), but I believe I'm exposed to
more general aviation experiences, both personal and through the
hotel, in a month than you are in a year.


You're exposed to engine wear & tear and the analysis of the reasons for it?
Come on, Jay, get real.

There are very good, very real reasons why some rentals (and more
partnerships) specify "no touch & goes" in their written agreements.


There are? Which? What kind of aircraft? What kind of rental outfit? I would
wager that the reasons are very different from what you pretend to think.

It's the hardest thing you can do to your aircraft in "normal" (non-
aerobatic) use, period.


Again, give us a hint at the reasoning.

Further, any student knows that a touch & go is a much more difficult
maneuver to perform than a full-stop landing.


Ah! Now we're getting somewhere. Yes, loss-of-control accidents are common
during landing and take-off. That has nothing to do with engine wear, of
course.

It's harder on the
equipment (ask your A&P about tires, brakes, wheel bearings, etc., on
aircraft that do a lot of touch & goes), and carries with it the
increased risk of a botched go-round, etc.


You're dodging the topic, my friend - and you know it. You where talking
engines exclusively, not the rest of the plane.

This is why, by the way, your insurance goes up if you tell them that
your airplane is being used for training purposes. Actuarial tables
don't lie, and your plane is more likely to be damaged while training
a new pilot.


See above. You're dodging the topic in true MX style.

I do believe this thread proves the old Usenet adage that "anyone will
argue anything". For you to be questioning the rather obvious fact
that high-power/low-power engine operations are harder on an aircraft
than steady-state engine operations illustrates a remarkable, um,
quality.


Jay. Please. In case you haven't noticed, there's more than a handful of people
here arguing your point. So there's no reason at all to get personal. Sadly,
you do. As always.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scared of mid-airs Frode Berg Piloting 355 August 20th 06 05:27 PM
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV John Doe Aviation Marketplace 1 January 19th 06 08:58 PM
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated D. Strang Military Aviation 0 April 7th 04 10:36 PM
Scared and trigger-happy John Galt Military Aviation 5 January 31st 04 12:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.