A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 6th 07, 09:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise


Dan_Thomas_ wrote

The Thielert also has maintenance drawbacks. We checked
into getting some for our 172s, and to maintain them you need either
to take them to an approved repair facility, or go to Texas and take a
two-week (IIRC) course in their maintenance. And buy a bunch of
expensive tools. Any major repairs requires a removal of the engine
and sending it to the approved repair people. Can't take the head off,
for instance, and re-ring a piston or do the valves.
There's no TBO. They call it a TBR, where the whole engine is
replaced with a new one. I can't put my finger on the time but I think
it's around 2400 hours.


Everything but the TBR may be nearly a non issue, if the Thielert has the
kind of no mess reliability I have grown to expect from most diesels. Re
ringing and doing valves are things that an air cooled engine may need
often, but a diesel will probably not need until it is replaced.

Only time will tell how they hold up, once they get into the field with
sufficient numbers. I have a feeling they will be impressive.

I also suspect that the TBR thing could change, also. The factory probably
is going to get all of those replaced engines into their shop, and do a
complete tear-down, and inspection and measurement of every part in the
engine, to get a feel for areas that may need improvement, or possibly could
be made lighter.

I look forward to seeing many Thielerts in the air, and hopefully someone
else will get a product into the air, also. The jet fuel burning IC engine
is GA's best hope for the little guy, IMHO.
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old October 6th 07, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

Morgans wrote:
Dan_Thomas_ wrote

The Thielert also has maintenance drawbacks. We checked
into getting some for our 172s, and to maintain them you need either
to take them to an approved repair facility, or go to Texas and take a
two-week (IIRC) course in their maintenance. And buy a bunch of
expensive tools. Any major repairs requires a removal of the engine
and sending it to the approved repair people. Can't take the head off,
for instance, and re-ring a piston or do the valves.
There's no TBO. They call it a TBR, where the whole engine is
replaced with a new one. I can't put my finger on the time but I think
it's around 2400 hours.


Everything but the TBR may be nearly a non issue, if the Thielert has the
kind of no mess reliability I have grown to expect from most diesels. Re
ringing and doing valves are things that an air cooled engine may need
often, but a diesel will probably not need until it is replaced.

Only time will tell how they hold up, once they get into the field with
sufficient numbers. I have a feeling they will be impressive.

I also suspect that the TBR thing could change, also. The factory probably
is going to get all of those replaced engines into their shop, and do a
complete tear-down, and inspection and measurement of every part in the
engine, to get a feel for areas that may need improvement, or possibly could
be made lighter.

I look forward to seeing many Thielerts in the air, and hopefully someone
else will get a product into the air, also. The jet fuel burning IC engine
is GA's best hope for the little guy, IMHO.


Yes, this may be the case, however the TBR has to get closer to 4,000
hours than to 2,400. Most auto and truck diesels will last at least
twice as long as similar size gas engines, so with Lycs and Contis
lasting 2,000 hours fairly routinely, the Thielert needs to at least
double that ... unless the replacement cost is equivalent to an overhaul
of a Lyc or Conti.

Matt
  #3  
Old October 6th 07, 11:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

Matt Whiting wrote:

Yes, this may be the case, however the TBR has to get closer to 4,000
hours than to 2,400. Most auto and truck diesels will last at least
twice as long as similar size gas engines, so with Lycs and Contis
lasting 2,000 hours fairly routinely, the Thielert needs to at least
double that ... unless the replacement cost is equivalent to an overhaul
of a Lyc or Conti.


According to http://www.centurion-engines.com/ it's currently 24,445
Euros for a replacement engine. Count in the total fuel and maintenance
cost over the life span and do the math.
  #4  
Old October 7th 07, 01:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:55:49 +0200, Stefan
wrote in :

According to http://www.centurion-engines.com/ it's currently 24,445
Euros for a replacement engine. Count in the total fuel and maintenance
cost over the life span and do the math.


And don't fail to factor in the US$1.4138 to the euro exchange rate.
  #5  
Old October 7th 07, 08:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

Matt,

so with Lycs and Contis
lasting 2,000 hours fairly routinely,


If only! They mostly don't, as we all know. Think midtime top overhauls.
Think crankshaft ADs.

the Thielert needs to at least
double that ... unless the replacement cost is equivalent to an overhaul
of a Lyc or Conti.


It's in the same ballpark with 2400 TBR.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #6  
Old October 6th 07, 11:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:42:47 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote in :

Re ringing and doing valves are things that an air cooled engine may need
often, but a diesel will probably not need until it is replaced.


So the diesel is liquid cooled?
  #7  
Old October 6th 07, 11:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

Larry Dighera wrote:

Re ringing and doing valves are things that an air cooled engine may need
often, but a diesel will probably not need until it is replaced.


So the diesel is liquid cooled?


http://www.centurion-engines.com/

It's liquid cooled, so no discussion about shock cooling anymore.
It's fully FADEC controlled, so no overheating possible.
It's geared, so a prop strike doesn't affect the engine.
It's fully FADEC controlled, so always best prop pitch to the chosen
power setting.
and and and... in short, everything I would expect from a modern engine.
  #8  
Old October 7th 07, 12:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise



Stefan wrote:

It's geared, so a prop strike doesn't affect the engine.



A geared engine doesn't eliminate, or even appreciably affect, the
results of a prop strike. You think the Cessna 175's engine is immune
from prop strike damage? Hell, even the turbine 210, whose prop isn't
even physically connected to the engine has prop strike issues. A
friend of mine has one and his pilot geared it up last year.


It's fully FADEC controlled, so always best prop pitch to the chosen
power setting.


Does it have an infinite range of prop speeds or is it like the Cirrus
that lets the pilot have two prop speeds?
  #9  
Old October 7th 07, 12:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

Newps wrote:

It's geared, so a prop strike doesn't affect the engine.


A geared engine doesn't eliminate, or even appreciably affect, the
results of a prop strike.


From the FAQ:

4. What happens if I have a prop strike?

In case of prop strike, a costly shock-loading inspection of the engine
is not necessary. Only the propeller needs a repair and the gearbox has
to be inspected. The CENTURION 1.7 has a combined system of torsional
vibration damper and a safety clutch. It decouples the propeller from
the core engine.

It's fully FADEC controlled, so always best prop pitch to the chosen
power setting.


Does it have an infinite range of prop speeds or is it like the Cirrus
that lets the pilot have two prop speeds?


http://www.centurion-engines.com/
  #10  
Old October 7th 07, 12:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default Cessna Anticipates AvGas Demise

Stefan wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote:

Re ringing and doing valves are things that an air cooled engine may
need often, but a diesel will probably not need until it is replaced.


So the diesel is liquid cooled?


http://www.centurion-engines.com/

It's liquid cooled, so no discussion about shock cooling anymore.


So we prevent a problem that isn't really a problem.


It's fully FADEC controlled, so no overheating possible.


Automobile engines have been digitally controlled for two decades and
they still can overheat.


It's geared, so a prop strike doesn't affect the engine.


The engine still stops suddenly unless the gearbox fails or is designed
to fail before any significant acceleration is transferred to the engine.


It's fully FADEC controlled, so always best prop pitch to the chosen
power setting.


Yes, that is a nice advantage.

Matt
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
100/130 avgas Roy Smith General Aviation 1 December 24th 06 09:17 AM
Old AvGas gwengler Piloting 2 December 16th 06 01:07 PM
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points Jim Culp Soaring 1 June 21st 04 04:35 AM
The demise of the Sea Harrier Henry J Cobb Naval Aviation 39 April 25th 04 07:27 PM
Here's to Arafat's Speedy Demise robert arndt Military Aviation 0 September 12th 03 07:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.