![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: It's fully FADEC controlled, so no overheating possible. Automobile engines have been digitally controlled for two decades and they still can overheat. Yes, but they don't overheat because somebody set the wrong combination of three different knobs. What part of "so no overheating possible" didn't you understand? That statement is simply factually incorrect. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
It's fully FADEC controlled, so no overheating possible. Automobile engines have been digitally controlled for two decades and they still can overheat. Yes, but they don't overheat because somebody set the wrong combination of three different knobs. What part of "so no overheating possible" didn't you understand? That statement is simply factually incorrect. What part of "not possible" didn't *you* understand? Frankly I don't know abot the Thielert, but with the FADEC controlled engine *I* fly regularly (a non-certified engine which isn't sold in the USA), I've not been able to overheat it, and I *did* try. (Actually I've just tried to reach the allowed limits, of course.) So yes, it's a reachable goal. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote in news:b7358$47091384$d9a2714f$8838
@news.hispeed.ch: Matt Whiting wrote: It's fully FADEC controlled, so no overheating possible. Automobile engines have been digitally controlled for two decades and they still can overheat. Yes, but they don't overheat because somebody set the wrong combination of three different knobs. What part of "so no overheating possible" didn't you understand? That statement is simply factually incorrect. What part of "not possible" didn't *you* understand? Frankly I don't know abot the Thielert, but with the FADEC controlled engine *I* fly regularly (a non-certified engine which isn't sold in the USA), I've not been able to overheat it, and I *did* try. (Actually I've just tried to reach the allowed limits, of course.) So yes, it's a reachable goal. You try letting the coolant out? Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote You try letting the coolant out? That would definitely make it easier! Only you would think of doing that. ;-)) -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in news:lX9Oi.32$Mx6.29
@newsfe05.lga: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote You try letting the coolant out? That would definitely make it easier! Only you would think of doing that. ;-)) Well, the manufacture hopefully would, but being German they would probably say "this cannot happen" Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:12:36 +0200, Stefan
wrote in : Frankly I don't know abot the Thielert, but with the FADEC controlled engine *I* fly regularly (a non-certified engine which isn't sold in the USA), I've not been able to overheat it, and I *did* try. So, are you saying that the FADEC will command a reduction in engine power to reduce heating as the high-temp limit is approached? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
So, are you saying that the FADEC will command a reduction in engine power to reduce heating as the high-temp limit is approached? I'm not absolutely sure on this, but I don't think so. I think it just has an extremely efficient cooling system (overkill, so to speak) which is regulated by FADEC, i.e. reduced to keep the engine temperature high enough. Of course I believe that if one really tries, one *will* find a way to kill the engine. E.g. the POH forbids a sustained power setting of more than 75%. Or, as others have pointed out, remove the coolant before flight. Or if nothing else helps, take a sledge hammer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: It's fully FADEC controlled, so no overheating possible. Automobile engines have been digitally controlled for two decades and they still can overheat. Yes, but they don't overheat because somebody set the wrong combination of three different knobs. What part of "so no overheating possible" didn't you understand? That statement is simply factually incorrect. What part of "not possible" didn't *you* understand? Frankly I don't know abot the Thielert, but with the FADEC controlled engine *I* fly regularly (a non-certified engine which isn't sold in the USA), I've not been able to overheat it, and I *did* try. (Actually I've just tried to reach the allowed limits, of course.) So yes, it's a reachable goal. Drain the coolant and go flying. Tell me how long the FADEC prevents the engine from overheating. Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting schrieb:
Drain the coolant and go flying. Tell me how long the FADEC prevents the engine from overheating. Yawn. Dry the oil and go flying. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Matt Whiting schrieb: Drain the coolant and go flying. Tell me how long the FADEC prevents the engine from overheating. Yawn. Dry the oil and go flying. So, you finally admit that the FADEC can't prevent overheating. Matt |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
100/130 avgas | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 1 | December 24th 06 09:17 AM |
Old AvGas | gwengler | Piloting | 2 | December 16th 06 01:07 PM |
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points | Jim Culp | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 04 04:35 AM |
The demise of the Sea Harrier | Henry J Cobb | Naval Aviation | 39 | April 25th 04 07:27 PM |
Here's to Arafat's Speedy Demise | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | September 12th 03 07:45 AM |