![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 6, 8:21 am, Arno wrote:
Hello, I am computer scientist and usually really like fancy technology. But I just had my first flight with a "glass" PFD (Avidyne) and must say I am not impressed. In particular reading altitude and airpeed from these scrolling bands requires a lot more attention than with regular gauges, just like reading a digital clock takes longer than reading an analog one. Glancing at it and checking against a known picture, like "speed at 3 o'clock is fine on final" or "altitude at 20 minutes past midnight is minimum", just does not work anymore, instead I end up reading the actual numbers every time I look. Does anyone feel the same? Am I missing a particular technique? I'm not sure what a computer scientist does but I'm a software engineer with multiple patents, etc which I assume is similar. The transitioning to teaching in glass was almost effortless to me. Reading airspeed from a tape is much easier because you can also see trends easier. The only hard part is to accept the fact that you're not going to fly at 1,000 feet, it may be 1,005 or 995. On an analog gauge we don't notice the difference but it can be frustrating getting used to the difference when its right there to see. -Robert, CFII, FITS trained Technically Advanced Aircraft instructor. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure what a computer scientist does but I'm a software
engineer with multiple patents, etc which I assume is similar. The My English is not native, I guess I should say software developer. transitioning to teaching in glass was almost effortless to me. Reading airspeed from a tape is much easier because you can also see trends easier. The only hard part is to accept the fact that you're not going to fly at 1,000 feet, it may be 1,005 or 995. On an analog gauge we don't notice the difference but it can be frustrating getting used to the difference when its right there to see. My real problem is that the tape always looks the same. Squint your eyes and tell me your speed or altitude. You can with gauges because you still have a rough idea what a certain hand positon means. You can't with tapes, because whether 1000 feet higher or 20 knots faster, it looks pretty much the same. The difference is only in the numbers. Arno |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OSH Homerun? Glass Cockpit for the Budget-Challenged | Marco Leon | Piloting | 4 | July 27th 07 11:27 PM |
winter is hard. | Bruce Greef | Soaring | 2 | July 3rd 06 06:31 AM |
Why Not Use PC To Make Glass Cockpit? | Le Chaud Lapin | Instrument Flight Rules | 52 | July 19th 05 03:45 AM |
It ain't that hard | Gregg Ballou | Soaring | 8 | March 23rd 05 01:18 AM |
Glass Cockpit in Older Planes | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 2 | May 20th 04 01:20 AM |