A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airplane Pilot's As Physicists



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 10th 07, 05:34 PM posted to sci.physics,rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Airplane Pilot's As Physicists

Uncle Al wrote in
:

Le Chaud Lapin wrote:

Hi All,

There is a long discussion ongoing in rec.aviation.piloting about
what causes lift on a plane. You can read from the link below.
Please note that about 80% of the post are mostly ad hominem attacks
and should be ignored. There are some small bits of real discussion.


http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...wse_frm/thread
/b85a49e900a0c791/bb11fa289cd7864a#bb11fa289cd7864a

I am an electrical engineer with experience in analag design and
software, with math and physics background that you would expect of
an electrical engineer.

There are many points made in the discussion, but I would like to
focus on one in particular for the sake of progress.

There are people in the pilot's group, who think that lift on a wing
is analyzed as such:

1. There is air on outside of top of wing that is pushing down, but
reduced because of aerodynamics.
2. The *inside* of the wing contains air pushing up against the
underside of top of wing .
3. Let us ignore that the same air inside the wing pushes down on the
overside of bottom part of wing.
3. The difference in pressure against the underside of the top wing
on the inside of wing and top of wing on outside, is what gives plane
lift.

Note that they ignore the pressure inside the wing that pushes
downward on the wing.

I am trying to convince them that, if there is air on the inside of
the wing, it pushes against all sides of the inside of the wing,
including both top underside and bottom overside, and thereby
nullifying any effect it would have on the wing. Lift is caused by a
difference in pressure between the underside of the bottom of the
wing, and the overside of the top of the wing.

I count 8-9 people in the group who are utterly convinced that I am
inept at physics, mathematics, etc.

Note that some of these people have been flying aircraft for years,
even decades, while I am still a student pilot.

Comments from anyone who knows physics welcome.


1) Acrobatic airplane wings are essentially symmetric in
cross-section. They fly equally well rightside-up or inverted. Angle
of attack is important.

2) Bernoulli's law is strictly a 2-D analysis.

3) Dr. Penelope Smith rigorously derived vortex shedding is a major
lift component in 3-D. Don't be Cessna behind a jumbo.


Wow, you are a cut and paste genius Anthony.


Bertie

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pilot's Assistant V1.6.7 released AirToob Simulators 2 July 7th 07 10:43 AM
A GA pilot's worst nightmare? Kingfish Piloting 49 February 1st 07 02:51 PM
Pilot's Political Orientation Chicken Bone Piloting 533 June 29th 04 12:47 AM
Update on pilot's condition? Stewart Kissel Soaring 11 April 13th 04 09:25 PM
Pilot's Funeral/Memorial TEW Piloting 6 March 17th 04 03:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.