![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan G wrote: On Oct 10, 12:01 am, Tom Gardner wrote: Well, if you think through what happens in a collision between vehicles with different mass, and use conservation of momentum, then the lighter vehicle will experience a greater delta-v than a heavier vehicle. And consequently the lighter vehicle will also experience a larger acceleration than the heavier vehicle. That's rather important to the occupants, since it is principally the acceleration that determines how much brain damage they sustain. That's not correct either. The human body can survive an instant peak G of about 150 (the known record is 180, David Purely in a F1 car in 1977, who did 108-0 mph in 26"). It is always possible to find an exceptional case to prove or disprove any contention. Exceptional cases are not a good basis on which to make designs (or legislation for that matter). It is better to concentrate on the common circumstances first. What kills you in crash is the collapse of your "survival space", i.e. broken bones, crushing injuries, smashing your head on the wheel etc. If that is the case then crumple zones are a waste of time and all that is necessary is ensure that the cabin is so strong it won't deform. And since motor cyclists aren't in any confined survival space, their accidents are clearly more survivable. As the link to the Mini vs. F150 test shows, design is paramount, and that's something most large US SUVs are all too lacking. Materials are part of design. And I've no intention of defending any SUV's design. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Gardner" wrote in message ups.com... That's not correct either. The human body can survive an instant peak G of about 150 (the known record is 180, David Purely in a F1 car in 1977, who did 108-0 mph in 26"). It is always possible to find an exceptional case to prove or disprove any contention. All this talk about big vs. little (g). Here's a short clip that pretty much proves something or another . . . bumper http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAfZ1N56qjY |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bumper wrote:
All this talk about big vs. little (g). Here's a short clip that pretty much proves something or another . . . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAfZ1N56qjY And here's what happens when you try to make an evasive maneuvre with a SUV... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIEnQFpMj2Q&NR=1 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V Vehicle for the Apollo 4 Mission in the Vehicle Assembly Building 6754387.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:38 AM |
Lunar Roving Vehicle Installation of the Lunar Roving Vehicle in the Lunar Module.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:47 PM |
Suburban as a tow vehicle? | Ken Ward | Soaring | 11 | March 3rd 07 03:40 PM |
Looking for a towable tow vehicle | [email protected] | Soaring | 19 | February 5th 05 02:14 AM |
Tow vehicle for sale | Sam Fly | Soaring | 0 | February 4th 05 06:06 PM |