![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 3:57 pm, "01-- Zero One" wrote:
So to say that "Towing is simple. Follow these rules, and your rig will be stable in all conditions and not need stabiliser hitch." is in my experience a gross oversimplification. Think we'll have to agree to disagree - but I'd like to know of examples where these guidelines were met, but the rig was still unstable. One thing I don't mention which could be called an "oversimplification" is weight distribution within the trailer, mass should be concentrated low and over the axle. However you don't usually have much choice about that with a glider. Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK--I'll supply one.
1999 Chev Tahoe 1999 ASW27 + Cobra Tongue weight about 9% all tires new Begins sway at 68mph--diverging oscillation above 70 mph. Tried spoilers on vertical fin--no help Used nails as wedges to stabilize hitch in the receiver--no help. Attached same setup to a Ford Expedition--stable at up to 110 mph! Bought 2003 Chev Avalanche Stable at any speed traffic allowed! The difference---The 1999 Tahoe had a soft suspension and "vague" steering. The Avalance and the Expedition are much more stiffly suspended and the steering more precise. All three vehicles are massive compared to the Cobra+'27 The answer--IMO the "natural frequency" of the suspension no longer resonated with the trailer suspension "natural frequency" at highway speed. -- Hartley Falbaum "KF" USA "Dan G" wrote in message ps.com... On Oct 12, 3:57 pm, "01-- Zero One" wrote: So to say that "Towing is simple. Follow these rules, and your rig will be stable in all conditions and not need stabiliser hitch." is in my experience a gross oversimplification. Think we'll have to agree to disagree - but I'd like to know of examples where these guidelines were met, but the rig was still unstable. One thing I don't mention which could be called an "oversimplification" is weight distribution within the trailer, mass should be concentrated low and over the axle. However you don't usually have much choice about that with a glider. Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan,
Indeed, from reading many posts on the stability issue, it seems that a precise, stiff suspension is what makes the rig stable. I recall one poster saying his rig was not very stable till he fixed a somewhat worn and loose joint in the front suspension that was barely noticeable when driving normally, but it improved the stability of the rig enormously. I suspect that when the tow vehicle itself is heavily loaded, making it less stable, it can have the same effect and cause the rig to be less stable than when the tow vehicle is more lightly loaded. The Honda Accord I used to tow had a Iow cg and a fairly stiff suspension compared to many large tow vehicles. The Astir CS and heavy trailer were clearly stable to 80MPH, which is as fast as I ever went. Never tried faster as I never trusted the small tires on the trailer too much. I doubt stability is about the weight of the tow vehicle. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tommytoyz wrote:
Indeed, from reading many posts on the stability issue, it seems that a precise, stiff suspension is what makes the rig stable. And this explains partly why Americans tend to think they use trucks to tow. US cars have had a reputation for poor suspensions. Poor suspension means poor towing stability. Imagine someone towing with a large V8 with poor suspension. The tow will be unstable. Now try to tell that guy that towing with a smaller car will yield more stable results! No way, his logic will tell him he needs an even bigger car, i.e. a truck. As my girlfriend always said: It's not the size, it's the stiffness which matters. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 3:35 am, "HL Falbaum" wrote:
OK--I'll supply one. 1999 Chev Tahoe 1999 ASW27 + Cobra Tongue weight about 9% all tires new Begins sway at 68mph--diverging oscillation above 70 mph. Tried spoilers on vertical fin--no help Used nails as wedges to stabilize hitch in the receiver--no help. Attached same setup to a Ford Expedition--stable at up to 110 mph! Bought 2003 Chev Avalanche Stable at any speed traffic allowed! The difference---The 1999 Tahoe had a soft suspension and "vague" steering. The Avalance and the Expedition are much more stiffly suspended and the steering more precise. All three vehicles are massive compared to the Cobra+'27 The answer--IMO the "natural frequency" of the suspension no longer resonated with the trailer suspension "natural frequency" at highway speed. Of course different tow vehicles will tow differently, particularly with SUVs, many of which use suspension which can only be described politely as being "agricultural". My point (which I did not explain clearly) was that I doubt that if you had, for example, tried a negative noseweight or stuck a bunch of lead acid batteries in the end of the trailer your Tahoe would have towed at high-speed with stability. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan G wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:57 pm, "01-- Zero One" wrote: So to say that "Towing is simple. Follow these rules, and your rig will be stable in all conditions and not need stabiliser hitch." is in my experience a gross oversimplification. Think we'll have to agree to disagree - but I'd like to know of examples where these guidelines were met, but the rig was still unstable. My '89 Dodge Caravan and ASH 26 E trailer meets all your rules and is stable at 60 mph. At 70 mph, it's starting to quiver, and I've never dared go faster. So, is the rig "stable" or "unstable"? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 4:46 am, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Dan G wrote: On Oct 12, 3:57 pm, "01-- Zero One" wrote: So to say that "Towing is simple. Follow these rules, and your rig will be stable in all conditions and not need stabiliser hitch." is in my experience a gross oversimplification. Think we'll have to agree to disagree - but I'd like to know of examples where these guidelines were met, but the rig was still unstable. My '89 Dodge Caravan and ASH 26 E trailer meets all your rules and is stable at 60 mph. At 70 mph, it's starting to quiver, and I've never dared go faster. So, is the rig "stable" or "unstable"? What's the speed limit for a towing vehicle in the US? In the UK it's 60, so your rig would be "stable", though of course it would be preferable to have a higher safety margin in the event of cross-winds etc. Let me try and explain this another way: *if your trailer is trying to lift the rear of your tow vehicle when hitched, it will have reduced stability than if it's pressing down. *If your trailer has a heavy mass at the far end, it will have reduced stability compared to if it had that mass in low down over the axle. *If your trailer has underinflated tyres, it will have reduced stability compared to if it had correctly inflated tyres (and they might go "bang", too) *If your trailer weighs more than your towcar, it will have reduced stability compared to if the towcar was heavier than the trailer. I hope that's clearer. The Bath University guidelines were also developed using average Euro cars - I would not expect an tall, unstable American SUV or pickup with ancient suspension to be particularly stable in many circumstances, even when not towing. More recent models with relatively modern suspension should, of course, fare better. Dan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan G" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 16, 4:46 am, Eric Greenwell wrote: Dan G wrote: On Oct 12, 3:57 pm, "01-- Zero One" wrote: So to say that "Towing is simple. Follow these rules, and your rig will be stable in all conditions and not need stabiliser hitch." is in my experience a gross oversimplification. Think we'll have to agree to disagree - but I'd like to know of examples where these guidelines were met, but the rig was still unstable. My '89 Dodge Caravan and ASH 26 E trailer meets all your rules and is stable at 60 mph. At 70 mph, it's starting to quiver, and I've never dared go faster. So, is the rig "stable" or "unstable"? What's the speed limit for a towing vehicle in the US? In the UK it's 60, so your rig would be "stable", though of course it would be preferable to have a higher safety margin in the event of cross-winds etc. Let me try and explain this another way: *if your trailer is trying to lift the rear of your tow vehicle when hitched, it will have reduced stability than if it's pressing down. *If your trailer has a heavy mass at the far end, it will have reduced stability compared to if it had that mass in low down over the axle. *If your trailer has underinflated tyres, it will have reduced stability compared to if it had correctly inflated tyres (and they might go "bang", too) *If your trailer weighs more than your towcar, it will have reduced stability compared to if the towcar was heavier than the trailer. I hope that's clearer. The Bath University guidelines were also developed using average Euro cars - I would not expect an tall, unstable American SUV or pickup with ancient suspension to be particularly stable in many circumstances, even when not towing. More recent models with relatively modern suspension should, of course, fare better. Dan On our USA Interstate Highways, speeds tend to average 75mph. Speed limits are lower, but not usually enforced until above 80 mph or more. Even the Semi trailers (18 Wheel trucks) are doing 70-75 or more. If you drive 65, you are continually passed by these trucks, each producing "bow waves" that induce more sway. So stability up to 80 mph is highly desirable. The above noted points all contribute to stability, but I tried them all, and then some, one at a time, and in combinations. There was no dramatic improvement until I changed vehicles. The Tahoe and the Avalanche weigh about the same. The Avalanche has a longer wheelbase. They both have live rear axles and use the same tires. IMO the best way to improve a tow vehichle is with "helper springs" to stiffen the rear, and if needed, the front, suspension. These are easy to add, relatively inexpensive, and can improve the handling even without the trailer. Of course, this is after bringing the suspension up to "specs" first. Shortening the distance between the hitch and the rear axle, where possible, helps too. Two inches can make a difference. Hartley Falbaum "KF" USA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding safety in collisions:
Linked bellow is a report from the institute for Highway safety that shows that a car colliding with a heavy SUV favors the occupants of the SUV enormously. These are death statistics. However, in Solo acciddents, like spin outs and collisions with immovable objects, the car is far better and the statistics support this. Because in cars, 42% of deaths are in solo accidents. In SUVs, 63% of deaths are in solo accidents. So basically, don't loose control of an SUV or hit anything. In cars, only 27% of deaths occur when cars are involved with something bigger than themselves, including buses. The report concludes that by far, the most deaths occur in solo crashes in both cars and SUVs. This speaks against SUVs being safer overall. Overall, except for slow city driving, I doubt the SUV is safer and I personally don't feel safer in one cruising on a country road or freeway, especially towing something. Report: http://www.iihs.org/sr/pdfs/sr4005.pdf |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan G wrote:
My '89 Dodge Caravan and ASH 26 E trailer meets all your rules and is stable at 60 mph. At 70 mph, it's starting to quiver, and I've never dared go faster. So, is the rig "stable" or "unstable"? What's the speed limit for a towing vehicle in the US? The highest speeds are on the Interstates. In California, it's 55 mph; in Montana, it's 75 mph. Other states are between these two. In the UK it's 60, so your rig would be "stable", though of course it would be preferable to have a higher safety margin in the event of cross-winds etc. So, the study investigated relatively short, wide, and tall trailers towed no faster than 60 mph. It doesn't seem likely to have much to offer the typical glider pilot! The point I'm trying to make is most of the glider towing combinations can go fast enough to become unstable, and following the "rules" doesn't ensure stability at even legal speeds, much less at the speeds many pilots want to tow. Let me try and explain this another way: *if your trailer is trying to lift the rear of your tow vehicle when hitched, it will have reduced stability than if it's pressing down. *If your trailer has a heavy mass at the far end, it will have reduced stability compared to if it had that mass in low down over the axle. *If your trailer has underinflated tyres, it will have reduced stability compared to if it had correctly inflated tyres (and they might go "bang", too) *If your trailer weighs more than your towcar, it will have reduced stability compared to if the towcar was heavier than the trailer. I think we all agreed from the start that the "rules" were sensible; what some of us have pointed out is they are not sufficient. If pilots never towed over 60 mph, we'd have far fewer trailer towing discussions! And a lot fewer accidents, too. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V Vehicle for the Apollo 4 Mission in the Vehicle Assembly Building 6754387.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:38 AM |
Lunar Roving Vehicle Installation of the Lunar Roving Vehicle in the Lunar Module.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:47 PM |
Suburban as a tow vehicle? | Ken Ward | Soaring | 11 | March 3rd 07 03:40 PM |
Looking for a towable tow vehicle | [email protected] | Soaring | 19 | February 5th 05 02:14 AM |
Tow vehicle for sale | Sam Fly | Soaring | 0 | February 4th 05 06:06 PM |