A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Antifreeze that is safe with integral water ballast tanks



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 13th 07, 05:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Antifreeze that is safe with integral water ballast tanks

At 07:42 13 October 2007, wrote:
For flights limited to a single day and the ballast
added the day of
flight, I do not believe antifreeze is necessary.
Given the very high
heat capacity of water, the large volume, and the agitation
that
occurs during flight, it would not freeze. Dumping
partial loads
might be a problem in that the valves may ice up, preventing
further
dumping.

Environmentally, ethanol would be the safest. Propylene
glycol iand
isopropyl alcohol are very toxic and very attractive
to mammals.

It is good to see glider pilots considering environmental
concerns, so I will add this. Isopropanol is mildly
toxic yes, but evaporates molecularly free (this is
why surgeons used it to clean instruments before autoclaves),
at pretty low temps and would very likely evap before
hitting the ground with the rest of the water it was
entrained in. Also it is not at all attractive to animals,
as in liquid form it is fumy, bitter, and really smells
bad (offer your dog some on a rag, you'll see).
Propylene glycol is what is used in eco-friendly antifreeze,
as opposed to the highly toxic ethylene glycol which
as already pointed out, is what is in regular antifreeze
(and tastes good to cats/dogs).
To wrap it up, ethenol, although not toxic in and of
itself, is not available without spending a great deal
of money/gallon, or being denatured--made toxic. This
keeps the bartender in business, and makes the otherwise
drinkable effluent rather poisonous (more so than isoproanol)
to man or beast, rendering it a poor choice for eco
friendly ballast tank antifreeze.
The non-toxic propylene glycol based antifreeze (commonly
called RV Antifreeze), at around $5-$7 a gallon would
probably be the best, cheapest 'responsible' choice.
If you are right about the valves being the weak link
in the freezing chain, it surprises me that none of
the manufacturers offer heated dump valves. (after-market
retrofit maybe?) Winter temps at altitude can be...well
a little balmy. I wonder, what kind of studies have
already been done on this?

Paul Hanson


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tail ballast antifreeze [email protected] Soaring 35 April 27th 11 05:22 PM
Who first used water ballast and when? John McCullagh Soaring 9 October 18th 06 09:36 AM
Water Ballast Upgrade P.Corbett Soaring 5 December 5th 05 02:32 PM
water ballast leak Robert Harvey Soaring 2 May 27th 05 03:49 PM
ballasting with integral tanks Flavio Formosa Soaring 4 September 21st 04 10:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.