![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Stickney wrote:
snip From the A-7D SAC Chart, Oct 1970: Empty Weight: 19,733# Basic Weight: 20,331# Max Takeoff: 42,000# Note that: Full internal fuel is 9263#, Full External fuel is 7848# (4 300 U.S. Gallon cans) While the weapons loadout charts aren't included, the loads for teh example missions indicate that each wing pylon was good fpr 2000#. The performace section shows a typical load of 2 M117 750# (nominal, actual weight was a hair over 800#) each on 4 pylons, or 2 pylons of bombs and 2 tanks. The latter seems to have been typical in SEA. Dorr has photos of 354th TFW A-7Ds with 8 Mk. 82s in a slant 4 (possibly a clearance issue with the tanks, if not gross weight) on intermediate pylon MERs plus tanks on the I/Bs; or 6 x CBU-58s, three per MER (same location as above) plus tanks. One shot shows the slant four Mk.82 load (probably. It's an end-on in-flight shot where the bomb type is a bit hard to define, showing a pair of A-7Ds flying on either wing of an F-111 leadship carrying a full load of 24 bombs), plus probably single MK. 82s on the O/Bs; for a total of 10. Oddly enough, for an a/c that was used entensively for CSAR Dorr has no shots of A-7Ds carrying Mk.82 snakes. [BTW, the weight of M117s seems to have changed quite a bit during production. The F-105B & D SACs in the D&S volume shows them at 799 lb., while alll later SACs and other sources show them at 823 lb.] The '79 Jane's lists lists teh pylon ratings as 3500# each for the wing outboars, and 2500# each for the 2 pairs of wing inboars, for a total of 15,000#. '82-'83 Jane's has it right (per a former A-7 jock I know): 3,500 for the the O/B and Intermediate pylons, 2,500 for the I/Bs. Given the SLUF's lack of Excess Power, I doubt that a load of that size was ever considered. Well, it's credited by Jane's with a t/o roll of 5,600 ft. @ MTOW, but that's presumably in a far lower drag configuration than wall- -to-wall loaded MERs. Besides 5,600 feet is 520 feet more than the F-105D requires with 16 x M117s (albeit less than an F-105G at max. gross), so I think we can safely assume that an A-7D's t/o from Korat at max. gross would make the F-105D look relatively spritely. In any case, the A-7 handily met the requirement for doubling the A-4's payload/range. Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |