A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 18th 07, 05:24 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Norm DePlume
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:02 GMT, "HEMI-Powered" wrote:

Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...

Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg
`
Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg


I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin
I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson
AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird!
Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the
XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2
prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get
developed or have a very short life.


Hello,
By the time she was ready to fly, her speed and altitude capabilities
were insufficient to protect her from the, by then, improved Soviet
surface-to-air missile capabilities. Additionally, the costs of
production and operation were deemed excessive. Yes, only two were
built, but the second crashed during testing, taking with her co-pilot
Carl Cross and chase pilot Joe Walker.
  #2  
Old October 19th 07, 01:53 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Grumpy AuContraire[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 141
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)



Norm DePlume wrote:

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:02 GMT, "HEMI-Powered" wrote:


Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour
...


Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg
`
Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg


I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin
I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson
AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird!
Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the
XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2
prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get
developed or have a very short life.



Hello,
By the time she was ready to fly, her speed and altitude capabilities
were insufficient to protect her from the, by then, improved Soviet
surface-to-air missile capabilities. Additionally, the costs of
production and operation were deemed excessive. Yes, only two were
built, but the second crashed during testing, taking with her co-pilot
Carl Cross and chase pilot Joe Walker.



The crash was not the result of testing but a mishap during a aerial
photo op when one of smaller planes of the formation collided with the
XB-70.

JT

  #3  
Old October 19th 07, 05:53 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Norm DePlume
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (1/1)

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:53:39 GMT, Grumpy AuContraire
wrote:


The crash was not the result of testing but a mishap during a aerial
photo op when one of smaller planes of the formation collided with the
XB-70.

JT

Quite true, although, to my mind, all official flights of
pre-production aircraft are, albeit loosely, considered tests.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (0/1) Greg Farr Aviation Photos 3 October 22nd 07 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.