A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine out practice



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 19th 07, 12:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Engine out practice

Matt Whiting wrote in
:

J.Kahn wrote:

It's not a problem when heating because the head expands faster than
the steel parts so the stress effects are reversed. This is why the
manufacturers have no problem with going from idle to full power as
soon as the engine will take it without stumbling. There is no such
thing as shock heating...


What about the aluminum piston in the steel cylinder?


That can happen too! But the clearances are cgrater ther than it would be
in a valve stem or head to cylinder seat.

Bertie
  #2  
Old October 20th 07, 01:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Engine out practice

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:05:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:

J.Kahn wrote:

It's not a problem when heating because the head expands faster than
the steel parts so the stress effects are reversed. This is why the
manufacturers have no problem with going from idle to full power as
soon as the engine will take it without stumbling. There is no such
thing as shock heating...


What about the aluminum piston in the steel cylinder?


That can happen too! But the clearances are cgrater ther than it would be
in a valve stem or head to cylinder seat.


If we had that kind of piston to cylinder clearance in an automotive
engine we'd think it was worn out. :-)) At least in the "old days".

Roger (K8RI)


Bertie

  #3  
Old October 20th 07, 02:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Engine out practice

"Roger (K8RI)" wrote in
:

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:05:32 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:

J.Kahn wrote:

It's not a problem when heating because the head expands faster
than the steel parts so the stress effects are reversed. This is
why the manufacturers have no problem with going from idle to full
power as soon as the engine will take it without stumbling. There
is no such thing as shock heating...

What about the aluminum piston in the steel cylinder?


That can happen too! But the clearances are cgrater ther than it would
be in a valve stem or head to cylinder seat.


If we had that kind of piston to cylinder clearance in an automotive
engine we'd think it was worn out. :-)) At least in the "old days".



Yes, some air cooled engines have tapered bores (when cold) to allow for
different rates of expansion in cylinder base-to-head so that it's
perfectly cylindrical when up to temp, but i don't know of any aircraft
engines that have that feature.



Bertie
  #4  
Old October 20th 07, 04:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Engine out practice


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote

Yes, some air cooled engines have tapered bores (when cold) to allow for
different rates of expansion in cylinder base-to-head so that it's
perfectly cylindrical when up to temp, but i don't know of any aircraft
engines that have that feature.


Really? I thought that they did have a tighter bore at the top. I guess I
read wrong, or remember wrong.
--
Jim in NC


  #5  
Old October 20th 07, 11:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Engine out practice

"Morgans" wrote in
:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote

Yes, some air cooled engines have tapered bores (when cold) to allow
for different rates of expansion in cylinder base-to-head so that
it's perfectly cylindrical when up to temp, but i don't know of any
aircraft engines that have that feature.


Really? I thought that they did have a tighter bore at the top. I
guess I read wrong, or remember wrong.


Maybe. I didn't know that they did. It would make sense if they did, all
right. I don't do machining. I just run my fingers over the pretty parts
when they come out of the machine shop!

Bertie
  #6  
Old October 20th 07, 11:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Engine out practice



Yes, some air cooled engines have tapered bores (when cold) to allow
for different rates of expansion in cylinder base-to-head so that
it's perfectly cylindrical when up to temp, but i don't know of any
aircraft engines that have that feature.


Really? I thought that they did have a tighter bore at the top. I
guess I read wrong, or remember wrong.


Maybe. I didn't know that they did. It would make sense if they did, all
right. I don't do machining. I just run my fingers over the pretty parts
when they come out of the machine shop!


This ought to be an easy question for someone in the group. Surely, there
is someone that does do machining on engines that hangs out here, that would
know for sure.

Anyone?
--
Jim in NC


  #7  
Old October 20th 07, 01:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default Engine out practice

On Oct 20, 4:41 am, "Morgans" wrote:
Yes, some air cooled engines have tapered bores (when cold) to allow
for different rates of expansion in cylinder base-to-head so that
it's perfectly cylindrical when up to temp, but i don't know of any
aircraft engines that have that feature.


Really? I thought that they did have a tighter bore at the top. I
guess I read wrong, or remember wrong.


Maybe. I didn't know that they did. It would make sense if they did, all
right. I don't do machining. I just run my fingers over the pretty parts
when they come out of the machine shop!


This ought to be an easy question for someone in the group. Surely, there
is someone that does do machining on engines that hangs out here, that would
know for sure.

Anyone?
--
Jim in NC


Ok, First off don't call me Surely. GGGG.
The concept is question is called "choke bore" and the idea is the
bottom of the cylinder that's close to the case runs at a much lower
temp since combustion happens at the other end. The top end grows at a
greater rate because of this. In theory when the engine is up to temp
the cylinder ends up being pretty straight. I have the specs around
here somewhere but if I remember correctly the bore when cold is in
the .006-.008 smaller at the top. Boring one is usually done by using
a tool post grinder and performing the taper feature is a calculated
process. Honing one with a flex hone is straight forward and easy,
using a Sunnen CK-10 or a CV-616 takes ALOT more practice...

Ben
www.haaspowerair.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine out practice Jay Honeck Piloting 155 November 9th 07 03:07 AM
Topi - Mig29 engine failure during practice - "topi.wmv" (11/26) 6.0 MBytes yEnc Immaterial Aviation Photos 0 January 6th 07 09:15 PM
Topi - Mig29 engine failure during practice - "topi.wmv" (09/26) 6.0 MBytes yEnc Immaterial Aviation Photos 0 January 6th 07 09:15 PM
Practice Engine-Out Landings Jay Honeck Piloting 52 July 14th 05 10:13 PM
A PIREP: engine-out turn-back - some practice in the haze Nathan Young Piloting 15 June 17th 05 04:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.