![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tina wrote in news:1192833924.408887.249380
@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com: A back of the envelope scribble says a smooth sinusoidal quatercycle from 0 to 20 degrees bank if done in something like a half a second would make a px sitting about 20 feet from the centerline experience a third of a g max. I think a half second is doable -- but very unlikely. Sounds like mountains and molehills, or, more likely, I really don't remember how to scribble meaningful stuff on the back of an envelope. Well, as someone else posted, t'd more likely through turbulence, but the thing would be FBW anyway, so it wouldn't be an issue. I can definitely see something like this appearing in the future. In flight anything that is not a wing is a waste, and as the Horten's proved, they can be made to work, and work well. But let's ask the expert, Anthony? Bertie |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote in news:79f137ded6b56@uwe: Here's an interesting proposal from 1929 : http://home.att.net/~dannysoar/BelGeddes.htm John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) And, appropriately, it was on the cover of popular mechanix or one of those around the time it was designed. I'd love to have flown it.. Did you see the crew list? A gymnast? THE CREW 1 Captain 1 Mate 2 Navigators 2 Pilots 1 Chief Engineer 2 Engineers 7 Mechanics 2 Radio Operators 2 Electricians 4 Seamen 1 Purser 1 Cashier 2 Telephone Operators 2 Clerks 1 Stenographer 1 Librarian 1 Baggage Master 2 Baggage Men 1 Chief Steward 1 Chief Dining-Room Steward 2 Head Waiters 2 Wine Stewards 24 Waiters 7 Bus Boys 1 Chief Bar Steward 9 Bar Stewards 1 Chief Deck Steward 6 Deck Stewards 1 Chef, 6 Cooks, 2 Dishwashers, 24 Room Stewards, 16 Room Stewardesses. 1 Doctor , 1 Nurse, 1 Gymnast, 1 Masseur, 1 Masseuse, 1 Barber, 1 Hairdresser, 1 Manicurist, 7 Musicians, I Shop Attendant, 1 Children's Room Stewardess |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tina" wrote in message
oups.com... ... The people who sit in the center section of a wide body are at 3 to 5 seats from a window. Although they may object to not having a window they nominally pay the same as a window seated person, and if the window seated person pulls its shade all are deprived of the view even if sitting one seat away. I don't think that most non-pilot care about getting a window seat - hence the popularity of isle seats... (I like the window so I can navigate along the flight.) I doubt the window proximity issue will have a serious effect on the market. Agree When we travel by a part 135 carrier we choose flights based on convenience and price, and don't even consider if the airplane is a wide body or not. Do readers of this newsgroup consider the type aircraft when buying tickets as a primary factor in choosing a flight? Not me. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Stewart wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote in news:79f137ded6b56@uwe: Here's an interesting proposal from 1929 : http://home.att.net/~dannysoar/BelGeddes.htm John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) And, appropriately, it was on the cover of popular mechanix or one of those around the time it was designed. I'd love to have flown it.. Did you see the crew list? A gymnast? Cool. I could even go and have a nap enroute. Bertie THE CREW 1 Captain 1 Mate 2 Navigators 2 Pilots 1 Chief Engineer 2 Engineers 7 Mechanics 2 Radio Operators 2 Electricians 4 Seamen 1 Purser 1 Cashier 2 Telephone Operators 2 Clerks 1 Stenographer 1 Librarian 1 Baggage Master 2 Baggage Men 1 Chief Steward 1 Chief Dining-Room Steward 2 Head Waiters 2 Wine Stewards 24 Waiters 7 Bus Boys 1 Chief Bar Steward 9 Bar Stewards 1 Chief Deck Steward 6 Deck Stewards 1 Chef, 6 Cooks, 2 Dishwashers, 24 Room Stewards, 16 Room Stewardesses. 1 Doctor , 1 Nurse, 1 Gymnast, 1 Masseur, 1 Masseuse, 1 Barber, 1 Hairdresser, 1 Manicurist, 7 Musicians, I Shop Attendant, 1 Children's Room Stewardess |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote Cool. I could even go and have a nap enroute. Like that stops you, now? g Do you get to access the net while in the cockpit? That could explain all of the extra time you have to post, all of the time! ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote in
: "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote Cool. I could even go and have a nap enroute. Like that stops you, now? g Do you get to access the net while in the cockpit? Nah, ACARS deletes flame posts. That could explain all of the extra time you have to post, all of the time! ;-) Well, that would be one explanation.... Bertie |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 19, 6:46 pm, Jim Stewart wrote:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: "JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote innews:79f137ded6b56@uwe: Here's an interesting proposal from 1929 : http://home.att.net/~dannysoar/BelGeddes.htm John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) And, appropriately, it was on the cover of popular mechanix or one of those around the time it was designed. I'd love to have flown it.. Did you see the crew list? A gymnast? THE CREW 1 Captain 1 Mate 2 Navigators 2 Pilots 1 Chief Engineer 2 Engineers 7 Mechanics 2 Radio Operators 2 Electricians 4 Seamen 1 Purser 1 Cashier 2 Telephone Operators 2 Clerks 1 Stenographer 1 Librarian 1 Baggage Master 2 Baggage Men 1 Chief Steward 1 Chief Dining-Room Steward 2 Head Waiters 2 Wine Stewards 24 Waiters 7 Bus Boys 1 Chief Bar Steward 9 Bar Stewards 1 Chief Deck Steward 6 Deck Stewards 1 Chef, 6 Cooks, 2 Dishwashers, 24 Room Stewards, 16 Room Stewardesses. 1 Doctor , 1 Nurse, 1 Gymnast, 1 Masseur, 1 Masseuse, 1 Barber, 1 Hairdresser, 1 Manicurist, 7 Musicians, I Shop Attendant, 1 Children's Room Stewardess Plus they carry six spare engines and a small internal railroad to ferry them into position. They could swap out an engine in five minutes. That's very reassuring! |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
... a px sitting about 20 feet from the centerline
[would] experience a third of a g max. A third of a g is what the forward acceleration of a jetliner is. Imagine that vertically, up and down and down and up, as the plane banks into and out of a turn. What do building elevators do? Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I chose a third of a G on a pretty arbitrary basis -- but you'd agree
that amount is much more noticable in the local vertical direction -- a direct sense of increased weight or more importantly the sense of growing lighter -- than into the back of the seat as a PX experiences during takeoff. My goal was to get a sense of how realistic the issue of Gs induced by rate of change of bank was, and have concluded (a rebuttable conclusion) it's not a problem for realistic airplane operations. Your comments tend to support that. tarOn Oct 19, 11:32 pm, Jose wrote: ... a px sitting about 20 feet from the centerline [would] experience a third of a g max. A third of a g is what the forward acceleration of a jetliner is. Imagine that vertically, up and down and down and up, as the plane banks into and out of a turn. What do building elevators do? Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and have concluded (a rebuttable
conclusion) it's not a problem for realistic airplane operations. Your comments tend to support that. Actually, my comments are not intended to support this. I think people would have a problem going up and down and down and up at a third of a g. It would feel like a roller coaster ride. Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 28 | August 3rd 07 07:51 PM |
X-48B Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft Takes First Flight [1 attachment] | §qu@re Wheels[_4_] | Aviation Photos | 5 | July 30th 07 06:17 AM |
Design merit of blended wing aircraft | Rob Mohr | General Aviation | 0 | June 13th 04 02:45 PM |
Blended wing bodies and sailplanes...? | Robert Bates | Soaring | 8 | December 23rd 03 09:34 PM |
Hitting airliner with rifle round? [was: PK of Igla vs. airliner] | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | August 20th 03 11:29 PM |