A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A-4 / A-7 Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 13th 03, 02:57 PM
Replacement_Tommel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Daryl Hunt says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt

says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner remarked that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10 because it "saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of course)


Tell the USAF that:

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html


mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".


Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------) ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32 During the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint force air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of the bad things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that claim.


"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------) ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.


The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.

-Tom

"For the cause that lacks assistance/The wrong that needs ressistance/For the
Future in the distance/And the Good that I can do" - George Linnaeus Banks,
"What I Live for"

UMA Lemming 404 Local member, 404th MTN(LI)

  #2  
Old October 13th 03, 10:24 PM
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINVA LIDBABY wrote in message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt

says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in

message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt

says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner remarked

that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10 because it

"saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of course)

Tell the USAF that:

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html


mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".


Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air

assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)

ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32 During the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint force

air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of the bad

things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that claim.


"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air

assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)

ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.


The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.


Nope. But most of the armor was destroyed even before the A-10 arrived.
The Bombers and Fighters took them out. Now, is he had said that 80% of the
Armor was destroyed that was left, I would put more credence in his
statements. Don't you recognise PR and Politicing when you see it? This
was NOT an official Air Force Statement.



  #3  
Old October 13th 03, 10:56 PM
dvick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:24:58 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
wrote:


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt

says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in

message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt
says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner remarked

that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10 because it

"saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of course)

Tell the USAF that:

http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html

mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".


Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air

assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)

ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32 During the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint force

air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of the bad

things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that claim.


"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air

assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)

ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.


The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.


Nope. But most of the armor was destroyed even before the A-10 arrived.
The Bombers and Fighters took them out. Now, is he had said that 80% of the
Armor was destroyed that was left, I would put more credence in his
statements. Don't you recognise PR and Politicing when you see it? This
was NOT an official Air Force Statement.



So to summarize, he provided a link to a document on an official Air
Force site which in turn cited the Air Command and Staff College
Seminar/Lesson Book for the specific information you disagree with.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but the famous "because Daryl
said so" argument to back up your claim. At least you're consistent.

  #4  
Old October 14th 03, 12:03 AM
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dvick" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:24:58 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
wrote:


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in

message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt

says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in

message
...
In article , Daryl

Hunt
says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by

Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner

remarked
that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10 because it

"saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of course)

Tell the USAF that:


http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html

mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".

Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air

assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)

ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32 During

the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint

force
air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of the

bad
things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that

claim.

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air

assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)

ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.

The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.


Nope. But most of the armor was destroyed even before the A-10 arrived.
The Bombers and Fighters took them out. Now, is he had said that 80% of

the
Armor was destroyed that was left, I would put more credence in his
statements. Don't you recognise PR and Politicing when you see it? This
was NOT an official Air Force Statement.



So to summarize, he provided a link to a document on an official Air
Force site which in turn cited the Air Command and Staff College
Seminar/Lesson Book for the specific information you disagree with.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but the famous "because Daryl
said so" argument to back up your claim. At least you're consistent.


I know PR when I see it. You people have no idea how much of this goes on.
Too bad. Things do blindside you when they come. When the PR is no longer
necessary, the changes they wanted to do all along happens.

But don't let that bit of fact get in your way.



  #5  
Old October 14th 03, 12:10 AM
redc1c4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Daryl Hunt wrote:

"dvick" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:24:58 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
wrote:


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in

message
...
In article , Daryl Hunt
says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in
message
...
In article , Daryl

Hunt
says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by

Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner

remarked
that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10 because it
"saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of course)

Tell the USAF that:


http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html

mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".

Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air
assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)
ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32 During

the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint

force
air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of the

bad
things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that

claim.

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's air
assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look Daryl ------)
ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.

The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.

Nope. But most of the armor was destroyed even before the A-10 arrived.
The Bombers and Fighters took them out. Now, is he had said that 80% of

the
Armor was destroyed that was left, I would put more credence in his
statements. Don't you recognise PR and Politicing when you see it? This
was NOT an official Air Force Statement.



So to summarize, he provided a link to a document on an official Air
Force site which in turn cited the Air Command and Staff College
Seminar/Lesson Book for the specific information you disagree with.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but the famous "because Daryl
said so" argument to back up your claim. At least you're consistent.


I know PR when I see it. You people have no idea how much of this goes on.
Too bad. Things do blindside you when they come. When the PR is no longer
necessary, the changes they wanted to do all along happens.

But don't let that bit of fact get in your way.


we're still waiting for your first bit of fact to come our way.

redc1c4,
not likely, but there's always one optimist in the crowd.... %-)
--
A Troop - 1st Squadron
404th Lemming Armored Cavalry

"Velox et Capillatus!"
  #6  
Old October 14th 03, 02:25 AM
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
Daryl Hunt wrote:

"dvick" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:24:58 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
wrote:


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in

message
...
In article , Daryl

Hunt
says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote

in
message
...
In article , Daryl

Hunt
says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by

Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done

by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner

remarked
that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10

because it
"saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of

course)

Tell the USAF that:


http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html

mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".

Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's

air
assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look

Daryl ------)
ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32

During
the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint

force
air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of

the
bad
things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that

claim.

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's

air
assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look

Daryl ------)
ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.

The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.

Nope. But most of the armor was destroyed even before the A-10

arrived.
The Bombers and Fighters took them out. Now, is he had said that 80%

of
the
Armor was destroyed that was left, I would put more credence in his
statements. Don't you recognise PR and Politicing when you see it?

This
was NOT an official Air Force Statement.



So to summarize, he provided a link to a document on an official Air
Force site which in turn cited the Air Command and Staff College
Seminar/Lesson Book for the specific information you disagree with.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but the famous "because Daryl
said so" argument to back up your claim. At least you're consistent.


I know PR when I see it. You people have no idea how much of this goes

on.
Too bad. Things do blindside you when they come. When the PR is no

longer
necessary, the changes they wanted to do all along happens.

But don't let that bit of fact get in your way.


we're still waiting for your first bit of fact to come our way.


Already presented it. Just because it's not what you want to hear doesn't
make it any less.

We have beaten this to death.

Thank you for playing. We have some nice parting gifts.



  #7  
Old October 14th 03, 03:07 AM
redc1c4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Daryl Hunt wrote:

"redc1c4" wrote in message
...
Daryl Hunt wrote:

"dvick" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:24:58 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
wrote:


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote in
message
...
In article , Daryl

Hunt
says...


"Replacement_Tommel"
'SINV ALIDBABY wrote

in
message
...
In article , Daryl
Hunt
says...


(sbip)


What mission? It's main role for Tank busting was done by
Bombers.

Nonsense. 80% of the MBTs taken out in Desert Storm were done

by
A-10s - even the USAF has damitted that (USAF General Horner
remarked
that
he took back everything bad he said about the A-10

because it
"saved his
ass.")

I don't know where you got your info (you made it up, of

course)

Tell the USAF that:


http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...4/fedor2a.html

mercy snip

You will not that it said "Ground Vehicles".

Huh?

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's

air
assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look

Daryl ------)
ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces.32

During
the
latter part of the ground war, Lt Gen Charles A. Horner, the joint
force
air
component commander (JFACC), stated bluntly, "I take back all of

the
bad
things
that I said about the A-10. I love them! They saved our ass."33 "

If the A-10 had done the bulk
of the Armor killing as you have claimed, it would have made that
claim.

"Although they represented less than 10 percent of the coalition's

air
assets,
A-10s were responsible for about 70 percent of the (Look

Daryl ------)
ARMORED
(----look Daryl) vehicles destroyed by coalition air forces."

Ground Vehicles consist of trucks more than anything else.

The article says "ARMORED" vehicles.

Armored vehicles consist of MBTs, SPA, and APCs.

Your reading skills are pitiful.

Nope. But most of the armor was destroyed even before the A-10

arrived.
The Bombers and Fighters took them out. Now, is he had said that 80%

of
the
Armor was destroyed that was left, I would put more credence in his
statements. Don't you recognise PR and Politicing when you see it?

This
was NOT an official Air Force Statement.



So to summarize, he provided a link to a document on an official Air
Force site which in turn cited the Air Command and Staff College
Seminar/Lesson Book for the specific information you disagree with.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but the famous "because Daryl
said so" argument to back up your claim. At least you're consistent.

I know PR when I see it. You people have no idea how much of this goes

on.
Too bad. Things do blindside you when they come. When the PR is no

longer
necessary, the changes they wanted to do all along happens.

But don't let that bit of fact get in your way.


we're still waiting for your first bit of fact to come our way.


Already presented it. Just because it's not what you want to hear doesn't
make it any less.

We have beaten this to death.

Thank you for playing. We have some nice parting gifts.


now you're channeling V-Man? you are desperate..........

who is Keyser Sose, BTW? %-)

redc1c4,
permanent party here @ FSB UMA
--
A Troop - 1st Squadron
404th Lemming Armored Cavalry

"Velox et Capillatus!"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question A Lieberman Instrument Flight Rules 18 January 30th 05 04:51 PM
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
A question on Airworthiness Inspection Dave S Home Built 1 August 10th 04 05:07 AM
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question jlauer Home Built 7 November 16th 03 01:51 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.