![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bagmaker wrote:
does the tow charge cover all the a/c costs, like insurance, maintenance, replacement after time etc? Everything. The tow plane just pays itself, everything included. The calculation is done on the basis of the estimated total hours over the year and recalculated and adjusted every spring. We charge per minute, airborne to touchdown of the tow plane. With this method, the glider pilot is absolutely free to decide where and how high he wants to tow. (We have several release points, depending on the weather, the time of day, where you want to fly and whether you want to fight in your first climb or just release and go. And of course all our gliders are radio equipped, so we can direct the tow pilot. (Such as in "Try that big cloud at 10 o'clock.")) We expect the tow pilots to make the round trip as short as possible, and they do their best. Of course there are some who do better than others, and sometimes they manage to find thermals to accelerate the climb, and sometimes they do not. We believe that it averages out over the year and that charging per minute is the most transparent and flexible method. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
We charge per minute, airborne to touchdown of the tow plane. With this method, the glider pilot is absolutely free to decide where and how high he wants to tow. (We have several release points, depending on the weather, the time of day, where you want to fly and whether you want to fight in your first climb or just release and go. And of course all our gliders are radio equipped, so we can direct the tow pilot. (Such as in "Try that big cloud at 10 o'clock.")) We expect the tow pilots to make the round trip as short as possible, and they do their best. Of course there are some who do better than others, and sometimes they manage to find thermals to accelerate the climb, and sometimes they do not. We believe that it averages out over the year and that charging per minute is the most transparent and flexible method. That is an interesting way to pay, although it seems unfortunate that I'd have to pay extra for a go around if one should occur. My club, like most (I think), charges by altitude and nothing more, except for exceptional circumstances like aero retrieve. I think there's a lot to be said for this, but in the back of my mind I always thought it was slightly unfair that a fully loaded two-place trainer going to 3000ft on a hot summer day got charged the same amount of money as a light single seater going to 3000ft on a nice cool day. Anyway, enough commentary, I have an actual question: roughly what do your costs work out to for, say, 1500, 2000, and 3000ft tows? Obviously it'll depend a lot on conditions but I imagine you have some idea of what your tow will cost before you launch even if it's not exact. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 21, 10:07 am, Michael Ash wrote:
John Smith wrote: We charge per minute, airborne to touchdown of the tow plane. With this method, the glider pilot is absolutely free to decide where and how high he wants to tow. (We have several release points, depending on the weather, the time of day, where you want to fly and whether you want to fight in your first climb or just release and go. And of course all our gliders are radio equipped, so we can direct the tow pilot. (Such as in "Try that big cloud at 10 o'clock.")) We expect the tow pilots to make the round trip as short as possible, and they do their best. Of course there are some who do better than others, and sometimes they manage to find thermals to accelerate the climb, and sometimes they do not. We believe that it averages out over the year and that charging per minute is the most transparent and flexible method. That is an interesting way to pay, although it seems unfortunate that I'd have to pay extra for a go around if one should occur. My club, like most (I think), charges by altitude and nothing more, except for exceptional circumstances like aero retrieve. I think there's a lot to be said for this, but in the back of my mind I always thought it was slightly unfair that a fully loaded two-place trainer going to 3000ft on a hot summer day got charged the same amount of money as a light single seater going to 3000ft on a nice cool day. Anyway, enough commentary, I have an actual question: roughly what do your costs work out to for, say, 1500, 2000, and 3000ft tows? Obviously it'll depend a lot on conditions but I imagine you have some idea of what your tow will cost before you launch even if it's not exact. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software Wear and tear on low tows is higher. Several clubs have a hookup charges to account for this. One large club I know something about, waives their active 'ops teams' members the hookup charge as an incentive for their service. The 'ops teams' work together regularly as scheduled. IIRC, hookup is $10/tow. So if you fly often, the value of your service time is pretty good. IANACPA, but fee waivers may be easier to handle than credits in a financial sense (no 1099- misc at the end of the year?). Another example, $8 hookup, $1.00/100ft, so a 2000ft tow is $28.00, up from $0.85/100ft 18 months ago. Tows above 9500msl or wave tows are charged at the service rate. This former rate was based on $125/hour service rate with approximately $5/tow profit over tow costs, including insurance, maintenance, tow ropes, rings, etc. The latter rate reflects increased fuel costs. Commercial tow pilots are paid a show up credit and small credit per launch. The engine reserve is set aside at some rate based on 2000tbo and 350tach hours per year. Last engine service was at about 2450 hours and cost about $35,000 for 0 time, 250hp stc, and new prop, including remove and replace. The funds were in the engine reserve set aside. Result is about one more tow per tach hour on same fuel burn, which meant no large adjustment was needed to tow rates as fuel charges increased. Of course this needs analysis at least annually. Presently, I'm pretty sure profit is zero at the moment, though I don't think there's a subsidy unless tow plane hours are under 350 for the year. There is no sinking fund for fabric or other contingencies. I think the transponder was expensed to the club. You just have to decide what you want to include in the cost of towing Set aside funds Airframe reserve Engine reserve Maintenance reserve Contingency reserve Insurance Consumables Fuel Oil Tires Brakes Tow ropes Weak links Tow rings Other Tow pilot remuneration Upgrades Then looks at your history and trends and come up with the numbers and try and forecast for the next year, 2 years, 3 years, and see if your tows are artificially low or sensible. Artificially low priced tows may mean that pilots are towing higher than really necessary. This lowers the launch rate, and believe me, there's nothing that matters more to the private owner than launch rate. Some clubs have thus banned or limited training tows during 'soaring hours' or made other 'creative solutions'. The approach to towing and pricing of same within a club includes more than just covering the cost. Frank Whiteley |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Whiteley" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 21, 10:07 am, Michael Ash wrote: John Smith wrote: We charge per minute, airborne to touchdown of the tow plane. With this method, the glider pilot is absolutely free to decide where and how high he wants to tow. (We have several release points, depending on the weather, the time of day, where you want to fly and whether you want to fight in your first climb or just release and go. And of course all our gliders are radio equipped, so we can direct the tow pilot. (Such as in "Try that big cloud at 10 o'clock.")) We expect the tow pilots to make the round trip as short as possible, and they do their best. Of course there are some who do better than others, and sometimes they manage to find thermals to accelerate the climb, and sometimes they do not. We believe that it averages out over the year and that charging per minute is the most transparent and flexible method. That is an interesting way to pay, although it seems unfortunate that I'd have to pay extra for a go around if one should occur. My club, like most (I think), charges by altitude and nothing more, except for exceptional circumstances like aero retrieve. I think there's a lot to be said for this, but in the back of my mind I always thought it was slightly unfair that a fully loaded two-place trainer going to 3000ft on a hot summer day got charged the same amount of money as a light single seater going to 3000ft on a nice cool day. Anyway, enough commentary, I have an actual question: roughly what do your costs work out to for, say, 1500, 2000, and 3000ft tows? Obviously it'll depend a lot on conditions but I imagine you have some idea of what your tow will cost before you launch even if it's not exact. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software Wear and tear on low tows is higher. Several clubs have a hookup charges to account for this. One large club I know something about, waives their active 'ops teams' members the hookup charge as an incentive for their service. The 'ops teams' work together regularly as scheduled. IIRC, hookup is $10/tow. So if you fly often, the value of your service time is pretty good. IANACPA, but fee waivers may be easier to handle than credits in a financial sense (no 1099- misc at the end of the year?). Another example, $8 hookup, $1.00/100ft, so a 2000ft tow is $28.00, up from $0.85/100ft 18 months ago. Tows above 9500msl or wave tows are charged at the service rate. This former rate was based on $125/hour service rate with approximately $5/tow profit over tow costs, including insurance, maintenance, tow ropes, rings, etc. The latter rate reflects increased fuel costs. Commercial tow pilots are paid a show up credit and small credit per launch. The engine reserve is set aside at some rate based on 2000tbo and 350tach hours per year. Last engine service was at about 2450 hours and cost about $35,000 for 0 time, 250hp stc, and new prop, including remove and replace. The funds were in the engine reserve set aside. Result is about one more tow per tach hour on same fuel burn, which meant no large adjustment was needed to tow rates as fuel charges increased. Of course this needs analysis at least annually. Presently, I'm pretty sure profit is zero at the moment, though I don't think there's a subsidy unless tow plane hours are under 350 for the year. There is no sinking fund for fabric or other contingencies. I think the transponder was expensed to the club. You just have to decide what you want to include in the cost of towing Set aside funds Airframe reserve Engine reserve Maintenance reserve Contingency reserve Insurance Consumables Fuel Oil Tires Brakes Tow ropes Weak links Tow rings Other Tow pilot remuneration Upgrades Then looks at your history and trends and come up with the numbers and try and forecast for the next year, 2 years, 3 years, and see if your tows are artificially low or sensible. Artificially low priced tows may mean that pilots are towing higher than really necessary. This lowers the launch rate, and believe me, there's nothing that matters more to the private owner than launch rate. Some clubs have thus banned or limited training tows during 'soaring hours' or made other 'creative solutions'. The approach to towing and pricing of same within a club includes more than just covering the cost. Frank Whiteley This is the kind of logic I used to use to try to convince my wife owning an airplane made economic sense since it "paid for itself". The members are the club. The club is the members and it's a non-profit. The members aren't 'customers'. If the club charges the members the true cost of operating the tug then it is, in effect, charging itself. A tug is a cost center, not a profit center. The fact that full cost of the tows are paid for by the individual members doesn't make it a 'break even' proposition. If the tug costs the members big money then, since the members are the club, it costs the club big money. It's financial shell game to say the tug is a"break even" operation. Put all the costs in one 'bucket' and take a hard look at it. You may fine one reason why soaring isn't growing. Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 21, 1:12 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
"Frank Whiteley" wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 21, 10:07 am, Michael Ash wrote: John Smith wrote: We charge per minute, airborne to touchdown of the tow plane. With this method, the glider pilot is absolutely free to decide where and how high he wants to tow. (We have several release points, depending on the weather, the time of day, where you want to fly and whether you want to fight in your first climb or just release and go. And of course all our gliders are radio equipped, so we can direct the tow pilot. (Such as in "Try that big cloud at 10 o'clock.")) We expect the tow pilots to make the round trip as short as possible, and they do their best. Of course there are some who do better than others, and sometimes they manage to find thermals to accelerate the climb, and sometimes they do not. We believe that it averages out over the year and that charging per minute is the most transparent and flexible method. That is an interesting way to pay, although it seems unfortunate that I'd have to pay extra for a go around if one should occur. My club, like most (I think), charges by altitude and nothing more, except for exceptional circumstances like aero retrieve. I think there's a lot to be said for this, but in the back of my mind I always thought it was slightly unfair that a fully loaded two-place trainer going to 3000ft on a hot summer day got charged the same amount of money as a light single seater going to 3000ft on a nice cool day. Anyway, enough commentary, I have an actual question: roughly what do your costs work out to for, say, 1500, 2000, and 3000ft tows? Obviously it'll depend a lot on conditions but I imagine you have some idea of what your tow will cost before you launch even if it's not exact. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software Wear and tear on low tows is higher. Several clubs have a hookup charges to account for this. One large club I know something about, waives their active 'ops teams' members the hookup charge as an incentive for their service. The 'ops teams' work together regularly as scheduled. IIRC, hookup is $10/tow. So if you fly often, the value of your service time is pretty good. IANACPA, but fee waivers may be easier to handle than credits in a financial sense (no 1099- misc at the end of the year?). Another example, $8 hookup, $1.00/100ft, so a 2000ft tow is $28.00, up from $0.85/100ft 18 months ago. Tows above 9500msl or wave tows are charged at the service rate. This former rate was based on $125/hour service rate with approximately $5/tow profit over tow costs, including insurance, maintenance, tow ropes, rings, etc. The latter rate reflects increased fuel costs. Commercial tow pilots are paid a show up credit and small credit per launch. The engine reserve is set aside at some rate based on 2000tbo and 350tach hours per year. Last engine service was at about 2450 hours and cost about $35,000 for 0 time, 250hp stc, and new prop, including remove and replace. The funds were in the engine reserve set aside. Result is about one more tow per tach hour on same fuel burn, which meant no large adjustment was needed to tow rates as fuel charges increased. Of course this needs analysis at least annually. Presently, I'm pretty sure profit is zero at the moment, though I don't think there's a subsidy unless tow plane hours are under 350 for the year. There is no sinking fund for fabric or other contingencies. I think the transponder was expensed to the club. You just have to decide what you want to include in the cost of towing Set aside funds Airframe reserve Engine reserve Maintenance reserve Contingency reserve Insurance Consumables Fuel Oil Tires Brakes Tow ropes Weak links Tow rings Other Tow pilot remuneration Upgrades Then looks at your history and trends and come up with the numbers and try and forecast for the next year, 2 years, 3 years, and see if your tows are artificially low or sensible. Artificially low priced tows may mean that pilots are towing higher than really necessary. This lowers the launch rate, and believe me, there's nothing that matters more to the private owner than launch rate. Some clubs have thus banned or limited training tows during 'soaring hours' or made other 'creative solutions'. The approach to towing and pricing of same within a club includes more than just covering the cost. Frank Whiteley This is the kind of logic I used to use to try to convince my wife owning an airplane made economic sense since it "paid for itself". The members are the club. The club is the members and it's a non-profit. The members aren't 'customers'. If the club charges the members the true cost of operating the tug then it is, in effect, charging itself. A tug is a cost center, not a profit center. The fact that full cost of the tows are paid for by the individual members doesn't make it a 'break even' proposition. If the tug costs the members big money then, since the members are the club, it costs the club big money. It's financial shell game to say the tug is a"break even" operation. Put all the costs in one 'bucket' and take a hard look at it. You may fine one reason why soaring isn't growing. Bill Daniels A club is also a member services organization and there's nothing that prevents a non-profit organization from making a profit. It's what you do with the profit that matters, that is, there can be no private benefit and the profit must go towards that stated purpose of the organization. Some clubs offer glider rides to the public for a fee as a means of capital accumulation. This is fine as long as it's properly done. The NFL is a non-profit organization. If a member avails themselves of specific services (assuming they have some choice), then any excess over costs benefits the membership as a whole. In my opinion, most services should be at least revenue neutral, though subsidies through dues are likely pretty common (many clubs do not charge extra for glider use but limit seat time to 1 or 2 hours). Careful planning for fixed costs, operating costs, replacement costs, and a vision of where a club wants to be in 5, 10, or 20 years should allow for some progress. Too many clubs use knee- jerk response management however. I know of one club operating at the same field as a commercial operator. If the club tow pilot does not show up on scheduled club days, members take tows from the commercial operator. It's my understanding that the member is then credited back the difference between the price of a club tow and the commercial tow. Furthermore, I understand the tow pilots are the only members that get a vote and pay no dues. Now, I'm not trying to tell any club how to conduct its business, but this doesn't seem a particularly appropriate way to use club capital. More curiously, how did such a policy develop? That club also had sold one glider and was considering selling a second due to underutilization. Training had dwindled to one day per week. What's really going on there? Now, were a club to offer a diversity of launch means, ground launch and aero tow, as equally available, then bucket subsidies would probably need to come into the business model for getting aloft. Certainly there would be pressure from those wanting affordable aero tows. Frank Whiteley |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
If the tug costs the members big money then, since the members are the club, it costs the club big money. It's financial shell game to say the tug is a"break even" operation. I don't get your logic. *Somebody* has to pay the tug. If it isn't the pilot behind the tug, then it's the club as a whole. Do you advocate that the non-flying pilots should subsidize the flying ones? Do you advocate low tow rates subsidized by high club membership fees? Do you think high membership fees would lead to a growth in club membership? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith" wrote in message . .. Bill Daniels wrote: If the tug costs the members big money then, since the members are the club, it costs the club big money. It's financial shell game to say the tug is a"break even" operation. I don't get your logic. *Somebody* has to pay the tug. If it isn't the pilot behind the tug, then it's the club as a whole. Do you advocate that the non-flying pilots should subsidize the flying ones? Do you advocate low tow rates subsidized by high club membership fees? Do you think high membership fees would lead to a growth in club membership? Of course it makes sense for individual members to pay for the services they recieve. That's just the nuts and bolts of club finances. It's up to a club membership to decide how they allocate costs and fees. Whatever they choose, there's no right or wrong answer as long as it's legal and the majority of the membership agrees. Having one activity subsidize another is fine if the membership agrees. But don't stop with the nuts and bolts, stand back and look at the big picture the way a prospecitve new member looks at it. They ask, "What's it going to cost me to fly gliders with this organization?" The cost of tows is a big part of the answer. If the total cost is too high, they go another direction. If that happens too often, the remaining members are burdened with a bigger and bigger share of the cost of a tug. I'm just saying look at it both ways and don't try to sweep the real costs of operating a tug under the rug by saying, "Well, it pays for itself so we're OK." If a smaller and smaller number of members are paying the cost, you're not OK, you're in a financial death spiral. A winch can be used to generate a substantial revenue stream while reducing the individual members launch cost - a big win-win. That revenue stream can be used to subsidize a tug. For sure, it won't work the other way around. Bill Daniels |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
But don't stop with the nuts and bolts, stand back and look at the big picture the way a prospecitve new member looks at it. They ask, "What's it going to cost me to fly gliders with this organization?" The cost of tows is a big part of the answer. If the total cost is too high, they go another The total cost is always the same, there's no free lunch. If your tows are too cheap, then the membership fees must be higher, unless you have some magic money print press in your basement. I strongly believe that high membership fees are much more prohibitive for new members than tow fees. My club bills the true towing cost. On the other hand, we don't bill the glider usage by time but by the membership fee, because glider ownership costs the same whether the glider is flown or not. A winch can be used to generate a substantial revenue stream while reducing the individual members launch cost - a big win-win. You don't have to convince me of the advantages of a winch, after all, I'm a winch driver. And I just *love* those catapult take offs. But as I said in another post, you can't go cross country from the winch at every site. At ours, for example, we mostly can't, so we use the winch mainly for training. As landing practice is a major part of the student training, a winch does reduce training cost tremendously. As you only need one launch for an 8 hour cross country flight, tow cost isn't such a big problem for cross country flying. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Ash wrote:
That is an interesting way to pay, although it seems unfortunate that I'd have to pay extra for a go around if one should occur. That's life. There is no such thing as a pricing system which is fair for everybody in all circumstances. My club, like most (I think), charges by altitude and nothing more, Most clubs I know charge by time. I guess this is regional culture. Anyway, enough commentary, I have an actual question: roughly what do your costs work out to for, say, 1500, 2000, and 3000ft tows? Obviously it'll depend a lot on conditions but I imagine you have some idea of what your tow will cost before you launch even if it's not exact. Well, we try very hard not to think about it... :-/ Seriously, it's hard to tell. There is no such thing as a tow to 1500, 2000 and 3000ft at our site (except for student training). There are tows to certain known or estimated thermals. The cheapest tow is to a hill right besides the airfield. On reasonable days you'll find a thermal there on one side or the other. This tow will be to approximately 2000ft. (You decide when to release: If you feel the thermals are strong and reliable and forming low, release earlier, if you think that you have to try and and search and work weak 100 fpm thermals which form only at altitude, release later.) A "normal" tow there is about $35 to $40. Caveat: Those thermals form somewhat late in the day and you will lose a lot of time if you want to go cross country. If you want to launch earlier and/or plan to do a big flight, you are better off towing to some known thermically active regions farther away. This will cost you about twice as much, but not because of altitude, but because of distance. You see, the "altitude price system" just wouldn't work here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Michael Ash wrote: That is an interesting way to pay, although it seems unfortunate that I'd have to pay extra for a go around if one should occur. That's life. There is no such thing as a pricing system which is fair for everybody in all circumstances. Certainly, just pointing out a small problem. My club, like most (I think), charges by altitude and nothing more, Most clubs I know charge by time. I guess this is regional culture. Interesting. In looking around at other clubs and commercial operations, the ones I've seen have always quoted prices for various altitudes. Time-based pricing has always been for retrieves from what I've seen. Of course I haven't looked at a huge number of places either. If you want to launch earlier and/or plan to do a big flight, you are better off towing to some known thermically active regions farther away. This will cost you about twice as much, but not because of altitude, but because of distance. You see, the "altitude price system" just wouldn't work here. Oh, it would work, maybe just not as well. Nothing says you can't keep climbing as you tow. You'll get charged for all the extra altitude. My club has no official limit on how high you can tow, you just get charged for wherever you get off. If you want to tow to some place far away, you can tell the tow pilot what your plan is and go straight out until you get there, then pay your fee for however high you were when you arrived. Maybe this will be higher than you'd like, but it does you no harm to start out with too much altitude (unless you're going for a badge, I suppose). Although I haven't really seen anyone do this; where I fly, a 3000ft straight out tow seems to be about as far as anyone likes to go. We do occasionally do higher tows, but not in order to gain more distance. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Towing with a 150 hp Pawnee? | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | November 22nd 06 01:32 PM |
PA-25 PAWNEE | Rafgsa Centre | Soaring | 2 | March 3rd 05 03:13 AM |
WTB Pawnee Prop | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 1 | November 2nd 04 06:57 PM |
Pawnee | Damien Dyer | Soaring | 2 | November 2nd 04 05:35 PM |
Pawnee hell | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 17 | October 27th 04 04:15 AM |