![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I vote yes, but I'll leave the tactical decision to the experts. I
think it's clear that Syria and Iran are on the wrong side of the "with us or with the terrorist" line. It seems clear that the State Dept has been a key player, again, in keeping the logical consequences of Syria's actions from being delivered to Syria. I hope that in this war on terrorism we don't forget to invade the State Dept and install a regime that will promote the US interest, rather than taking as their starting position one half-way between the US and other governments before their negotiating waters down that position further. -- Scott -------- "Interestingly, we started to lose this war only after the embedded reporters pulled out. Back when we got the news directly from Iraq, there was victory and optimism. Now that the news is filtered through the mainstream media here in America, all we hear is death and destruction and quagmire..." Ann Coulter http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2003/091703.htm Kenneth Williams wrote in message m... President Bush said that in addition to striking terorists directly that the US would also target those who harbor terrorists. I think it is clear that both Syria and Iran harbor terrorists and export terror in the region- especially in Israel, with Hamas and Islamic Jihad and even in Iraq against our own troops. Shouldn't we, like our Israeli friends, bomb Syria and Iran in pre-emptive or retaliatory strikes? I wouldn't like a widening of the war in the region but under these circumstances won't we eventually be forced to do something drastic? What is the general concensus here at RAM? I personally think Iran is the worst of the two and should be bombed if Tehran does not cooperate with the nuclear inspectors on its covert nuclear weapons program. The US can't afford to have a nuclear-armed Iran sitting right next door when the US is trying to rebuild Iraq and allowing democracy in that region. In addition, now we know how Israel feels daily with the US casualties in Iraq mounting. It is so frustrating to promote peace when you are constantly under attack by hostiles who want you to fail. I think Israel is justified with its doctrine of pre-emptive strikes. The US seems destined to follow under the circumstances. Kenneth Williams |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |