![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Whelan" wrote in message ... By way of conclusion, here's a thought problem for some dogmatic readers. I no longer worry about not having a slip in the landing arsenal of the ship I have most of my time in. Oh, it'll slip just fine, but its descent rate in a non-turning slip is significantly less than what it generates in the slip's absence. How can this be??? Regards, Bob - ruminatively - W. Check the LS-4 Pilot Handbook. It says that slips with full airbrake are not so effective because airbrake causes a strong nose-down pitching moment, and airspeed increases excessively. In practice, I have found this to be so---Full airbrake alone produces a steeper approach than full airbrake plus slip. Is that the case in your ship? Hartley Falbaum "KF" USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Polar with spoilers extended? | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 85 | October 29th 07 09:16 AM |
New 304S Sailplane summary now available | Tim Mara | Soaring | 5 | January 6th 07 07:13 PM |
Discus polar curve at high speeds | [email protected] | Soaring | 12 | December 20th 05 01:59 AM |
Competition rules summary? | Ted Wagner | Soaring | 2 | January 21st 04 08:25 PM |
Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 03:25 AM |